Rent eats 30% or more of income for 55% of renter households, a severe level, and 53% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,541 a month while the average household earns $84,432 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 16%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,065
Renter share35.3%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$84,432
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Huntington Village
Moderate
Within parent city
90th percentile
#4 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
High
Within county
53th percentile
#63 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Moderate
Within state
21th percentile
#5,447 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region
Centroid at 29.6599, -95.6101 · click any tract to drill in
Why Huntington Village scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,541 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0
How Huntington Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
83%Socioeconomic
59%Household composition
90%Racial/ethnic minority
62%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Huntington Village
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 5.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Fort Bend County average of 4.8 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Asian and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 80th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48157672004
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157672004?
Census tract 48157672004 in the Huntington Village neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48157672004?
Median gross rent is $1,541/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48157672004?
10.0% of residents in tract 48157672004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,001.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48157672004?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 59th, minority 90th, housing 62th.
Q5
Is tract 48157672004 considered part of Huntington Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48157672004 fall within Huntington Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 48157672004 compare to Sugar Land overall?
Tract 48157672004 scores 2.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Sugar Land at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land
Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.