Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #50,654 of 84,120 nationally

Sugar Land Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48157672305 · Fort Bend, TX · pop 5,374 · 80% of tract blocks fall in Sugar Land

Tract 48157672305 sits in Sugar Land eviction risk, TX, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.9/10. It is home to 5,374 residents. 49% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 5% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,852
Renter share36.3%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$98,958

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
High
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Elevated
Within state
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#2,880 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#50,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region

Centroid at 29.6465, -95.6348 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sugar Land scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$2,118 rent vs county FMR
8.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0

How Sugar Land compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sugar Land risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.9This tracttract 6723053.2Sugar Landparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sugar Land

87% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Fort Bend County average of 42.8%. The voucher gap is 38.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.9/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

Average gross rent is $2,118, 8% above the Sugar Land average. Nationally it ranks #50,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.7/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Fort Bend County average of 3.8 closely.

Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $98,958. 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48157672305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157672305?

Census tract 48157672305 in Sugar Land scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48157672305?

Median gross rent is $2,118/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 87% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48157672305?

11.5% of residents in tract 48157672305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,374.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48157672305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 39th, minority 75th, housing 24th.
Q5

How does tract 48157672305 compare to Sugar Land overall?

Tract 48157672305 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Sugar Land at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land

Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related