Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Sugar Land Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48157672202 · Fort Bend, TX · pop 2,955

The Lower-tier score of 3.9/10 for census tract 48157672202 reflects conditions in Sugar Land, Texas. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.

15% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,879 a month while the average household earns $83,261 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 26% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,050
Renter share30.7%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate12.3%
Median income$83,261

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
Very High
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Elevated
Within state
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#5,145 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region

Centroid at 29.6266, -95.6278 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sugar Land scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
12.3% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,879 rent vs county FMR
7.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0

How Sugar Land compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sugar Land risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 672202Sugar Land: 2.32.3Sugar Landparent cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sugar Land

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 7.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Fort Bend County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 48157672202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157672202?

Census tract 48157672202 in Sugar Land scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48157672202?

Median gross rent is $1,879/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48157672202?

12.3% of residents in tract 48157672202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,955.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48157672202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 35th, minority 63th, housing 42th.
Q5

How does tract 48157672202 compare to Sugar Land overall?

Tract 48157672202 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Sugar Land at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land

Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related