Sugar Land Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48157672202 · Fort Bend, TX · pop 2,955
The Lower-tier score of 3.9/10 for census tract 48157672202 reflects conditions in Sugar Land, Texas. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.
15% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,879 a month while the average household earns $83,261 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region
Centroid at 29.6266, -95.6278 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sugar Land scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sugar Land compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 42
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 42%Socioeconomic
- 35%Household composition
- 63%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What drives eviction risk in Sugar Land
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 7.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Fort Bend County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
About tract 48157672202
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157672202?
What is the average rent in tract 48157672202?
What is the poverty rate in tract 48157672202?
How socially vulnerable is tract 48157672202?
How does tract 48157672202 compare to Sugar Land overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land
Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.