Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Sugar Land Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48157672306 · Fort Bend, TX · pop 3,228

With a score of 3.3/10, tract 48157672306 in Sugar Land, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,228 residents. Cost burden runs 10% here against 42.8% across Fort Bend County.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 12% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,222
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$107,679

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
High
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Moderate
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#3,941 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region

Centroid at 29.6412, -95.6266 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sugar Land scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,984 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0

How Sugar Land compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sugar Land risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 6723063.2Sugar Landparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sugar Land

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The voucher gap is 29.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10. On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the Fort Bend County average of 3.8 closely. Average gross rent is $1,984, close to the Sugar Land average. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $107,679.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48157672306

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157672306?

Census tract 48157672306 in Sugar Land scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48157672306?

Median gross rent is $1,984/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48157672306?

8.8% of residents in tract 48157672306 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,228.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48157672306?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 6th, minority 57th, housing 2th.
Q5

How does tract 48157672306 compare to Sugar Land overall?

Tract 48157672306 scores 3.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Sugar Land at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land

Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related