Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,844 of 84,120 nationally

Firwood Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Pasadena

Tract 48201321900 · Harris, TX · pop 5,979 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 48201321900 sits in the Firwood Village neighborhood of Pasadena eviction risk, Texas eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.1/10. It lands near the 41st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 50% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,540 a month while the average household earns $63,944 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 31% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 15% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,426
Renter share31.1%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$63,944

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 5 tracts In Firwood Village
Very Low
Within parent city
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileBottomTop
#16 of 32 tracts In Pasadena
Moderate
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileBottomTop
#762 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Low
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileBottomTop
#3,818 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pasadena and the region

Centroid at 29.6958, -95.2249 · click any tract to drill in

Why Firwood Village scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pasadena
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,540 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pasadena
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pasadena
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pasadena
2.5

How Firwood Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Firwood Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 321900Pasadena: 2.42.4Pasadenaparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 290Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 8.98%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.8%Peak (2009)
  • 23Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013219002009: 51 filings (9.83/100 renter HHs)2010: 43 filings (9.95/100 renter HHs)2011: 36 filings (7.91/100 renter HHs)2012: 50 filings (10.99/100 renter HHs)2013: 51 filings (11.21/100 renter HHs)2014: 36 filings (7.91/100 renter HHs)2015: 23 filings (5.05/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 55% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020-2021)

  • 168Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020-2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Firwood Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Firwood Village

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 5.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Harris County average of 5.2 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.70x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201321900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201321900?

Census tract 48201321900 in the Firwood Village neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201321900?

Median gross rent is $1,540/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201321900?

16.0% of residents in tract 48201321900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,979.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201321900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 68th, minority 93th, housing 68th.

Q5

Is tract 48201321900 considered part of Firwood Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201321900 fall within Firwood Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201321900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 290 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201321900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.98% of renter households, peaking at 9.8% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201321900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 48201321900 compare to Pasadena overall?

Tract 48201321900 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Pasadena at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pasadena

Top eight tracts in Pasadena ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related