Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #66,104 of 84,120 nationally

Firwood Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Pasadena

Tract 48201322100 · Harris, TX · pop 4,158 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 48201322100 belongs to the Firwood Village neighborhood of Pasadena, Texas. It is home to 4,158 residents and scores 5.1/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 41% of US census tracts.

About 56% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,222 monthly, set against $55,257 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 60% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 27% Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,310
Renter share60.2%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate18.4%
Median income$55,257

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileBottomTop
#2 of 5 tracts In Firwood Village
High
Within parent city
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileBottomTop
#7 of 32 tracts In Pasadena
High
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileBottomTop
#526 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Moderate
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileBottomTop
#2,470 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pasadena and the region

Centroid at 29.6862, -95.2110 · click any tract to drill in

Why Firwood Village scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pasadena
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.4% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,222 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pasadena
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pasadena
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pasadena
2.5

How Firwood Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Firwood Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 322100Pasadena: 2.42.4Pasadenaparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 497Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 12.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.8%Peak (2014)
  • 62Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013221002009: 68 filings (10.32/100 renter HHs)2010: 68 filings (12.14/100 renter HHs)2011: 67 filings (11.65/100 renter HHs)2012: 63 filings (10.96/100 renter HHs)2013: 78 filings (13.57/100 renter HHs)2014: 91 filings (15.83/100 renter HHs)2015: 62 filings (10.78/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020-2021)

  • 321Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.72×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020-2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.59× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-04-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (0.61× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (0.93× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (0.61× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-06-01: 14 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.61× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (1.68× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Firwood Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Firwood Village

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 4.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Harris County average of 5.2 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.72x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 497 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 12.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.8% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201322100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201322100?

Census tract 48201322100 in the Firwood Village neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201322100?

Median gross rent is $1,222/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201322100?

18.4% of residents in tract 48201322100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,158.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201322100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 94th, minority 87th, housing 93th.

Q5

Is tract 48201322100 considered part of Firwood Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201322100 fall within Firwood Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201322100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 497 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201322100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.18% of renter households, peaking at 15.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201322100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.72× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 48201322100 compare to Pasadena overall?

Tract 48201322100 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Pasadena at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pasadena

Top eight tracts in Pasadena ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related