Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Ginter Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Richmond

Tract 51760010201 · Richmond city, VA · pop 2,159 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 51760010201 in the Ginter Park area of Richmond, VA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,159 residents. Severe burden reaches 41%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 5% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units912
Renter share24.6%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$123,611

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Ginter Park
Very Low
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#65 of 75 tracts In Richmond
Very Low
Within county
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#62 of 75 tracts In Richmond city
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,798 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richmond and the region

Centroid at 37.5962, -77.4553 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ginter Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richmond
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,316 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
2.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
5.0

How Ginter Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ginter Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0102014.3Richmondparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ginter Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ginter Park

Against Richmond City at 50.2%, 79% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.8/10.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. On the high side, regional political climate reads 8.4/10.

It sits 1.3 points below the Richmond City average of 4.3. Food insecurity runs 6.1% against 17.8% nationally.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.3% against 11.3% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 25% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 3.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $123,611, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the VA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 51760010201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51760010201?

Census tract 51760010201 in the Ginter Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 51760010201?

Median gross rent is $1,316/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 79% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 51760010201?

5.1% of residents in tract 51760010201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,159.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 51760010201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 5th, minority 40th, housing 32th.
Q5

Is tract 51760010201 considered part of Ginter Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51760010201 fall within Ginter Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 51760010201 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 51760010201 compare to Richmond overall?

Tract 51760010201 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Richmond at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 51760010201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richmond

Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related