Skip to content
Luling, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 5,531 residents

Luling, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Caldwell County · Population 5,531

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

58th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.7 Average2.1 Now2.3
2.7 1.7 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.7 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.7 1990 · score 1.8 1991 · score 1.8 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 1.9 1997 · score 1.9 1998 · score 1.9 1999 · score 1.9 2000 · score 1.9 2001 · score 1.9 2002 · score 1.9 2003 · score 1.9 2004 · score 1.9 2005 · score 1.9 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.1 2009 · score 2.2 2010 · score 2.3 2011 · score 2.3 2012 · score 2.1 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 2.0 2015 · score 2.0 2016 · score 2.1 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.1 2020 · score 2.7 2021 · score 2.5 2022 · score 2.4 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.1 Regional 5.1 State 1.5 Economic 6.0 Supply 6.6 Rent Control 5.3 Eviction 1.2 Tenant 7.0 Housing 5.2 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +14.4% (2024)
    5.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.1
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    9.9% poverty · 5.2% unemp.
    6.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,021 average · 36.4% renters
    6.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.8% of income on rent
    5.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    1.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    36.4% renters
    7.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Luling and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Luling compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Caldwell County
Very High
#1 of 3 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 cities in Caldwell County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Moderate
#899 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 51st percentileLowHigh
#899 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Luling risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Luling: 2.32.3LulingThis cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,021/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $1,120–$3,292 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 36.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 5,531 residents, 36.4% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 9.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.1 and 5.1 (GOP margin +14.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.2, housing court bias 5.2, rent-control risk 5.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6. Supply constraint: 6.6. The numbers behind those: 9.9% poverty, 5.2% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Luling sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.9 Austin New Braunfels, TX · 28d · ~$2.2k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.3 New Braunfels San Marcos, TX · 27d · ~$2.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 San Marcos Kyle, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($97/day) · score 2.1 Kyle Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.1 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Luling
Luling · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Luling, TX

Landlording in Luling, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Luling is a city of 5,531 residents where 36.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,021/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Luling eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Luling closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Luling's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Luling runs $1,120 to $3,292 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $1,021/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7/10 in Luling, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Luling: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,292 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Luling

Trap · 9.1 POINTS
Politically, Caldwell County voted Republican by 9.1 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral legislative pressure. Combined with 33.8% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of Property Code Chapter 24.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Luling tenant only pays part of the rent after I serve the 3-day notice?

If you accept partial payment after serving a 3-day notice, you often waive your right to evict based on that notice. It's usually better to refuse partial payment and proceed with the eviction. If you do accept it, you'll likely need to serve a new 3-day notice for the remaining balance. Consult an attorney before accepting partial payments if you intend to evict.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Luling without a reason?

If your tenant is on a month-to-month lease, you can terminate their tenancy without a specific "just cause" by providing a 30-day notice to vacate. However, if they have a fixed-term lease, you generally cannot evict them without a lease violation (like non-payment) until the lease term ends. There's no statewide "just cause" requirement in Texas, unlike some other states. See Texas tenant protections for more details.

Q3

How long does a Luling tenant have to move out after a judge orders an eviction?

After the judge issues a Judgment for Possession, the tenant typically has 5 days to appeal the decision. If no appeal is filed, you can then request a Writ of Possession. Once the Writ is issued and served by the constable, the tenant usually has 24-48 hours before the constable returns to physically remove them and their belongings. The constable will typically post a 24-hour notice of lockout.

Q4

Are there any rent control laws in Luling, TX?

No, there are no rent control laws in Luling or anywhere else in Texas. Texas has a statewide prohibition on rent control. This means you are generally free to set your rental prices as the market dictates, and you can raise rent with proper notice (usually 30 days for month-to-month tenants). For more information, check Texas rent control rules.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places Luling in the 58th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.