Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Lower Greenville Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113000201 · Dallas, TX · pop 2,872 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 48113000201 in the Lower Greenville area of Dallas, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Average gross rent is $2,133, 45% above the Dallas average.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 8% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,254
Renter share20.6%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$195,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Lower Greenville
Very High
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#327 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#474 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8327, -96.7572 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lower Greenville scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,133 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Lower Greenville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lower Greenville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 000201Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 95Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 1.65%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.6%Peak (2000)
  • 3Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130002012000: 11 filings (3.59/100 renter HHs)2001: 8 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (0.98/100 renter HHs)2003: 7 filings (2.29/100 renter HHs)2004: 10 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2005: 5 filings (1.54/100 renter HHs)2006: 7 filings (2.15/100 renter HHs)2007: 6 filings (1.85/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (1.23/100 renter HHs)2009: 2 filings (0.62/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (1.40/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.28/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (2.79/100 renter HHs)2014: 6 filings (1.68/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (0.84/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (0.38/100 renter HHs)2017: 3 filings (1.14/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 73% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 22Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lower Greenville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lower Greenville

The severe-burden share is 31%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against Dallas County at 47.9%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened.

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 17.0% against 31.5% nationally.

Court records carry 95 eviction filings across 18 observed years. Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. The voucher gap is 13.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Filings peaked in 2000 at 3.6% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 1.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113000201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113000201?

Census tract 48113000201 in the Lower Greenville neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113000201?

Median gross rent is $2,133/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113000201?

3.7% of residents in tract 48113000201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,872.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113000201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 12th, minority 17th, housing 1th.
Q5

Is tract 48113000201 considered part of Lower Greenville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113000201 fall within Lower Greenville (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113000201?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 95 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113000201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.65% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113000201 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113000201 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113000201 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48113000201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related