Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Dallas Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113005700 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,299

48113005700 is a census tract in Dallas, TX. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. Adults with no health insurance runs 32.9% against 11.3% nationally.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 23% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,921
Renter share39.5%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate30.5%
Median income$36,724

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 348 tracts In Dallas
High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,049 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.6993, -96.8000 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dallas scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
30.5% poverty · this tract
7.6
Supply constraint
$1,241 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Dallas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dallas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 005700Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,413Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 14.06%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.2%Peak (2001)
  • 84Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130057002000: 94 filings (19.14/100 renter HHs)2001: 99 filings (20.16/100 renter HHs)2002: 93 filings (18.94/100 renter HHs)2003: 77 filings (15.68/100 renter HHs)2004: 83 filings (16.90/100 renter HHs)2005: 77 filings (15.56/100 renter HHs)2006: 77 filings (15.56/100 renter HHs)2007: 89 filings (17.98/100 renter HHs)2008: 94 filings (18.99/100 renter HHs)2009: 59 filings (11.92/100 renter HHs)2010: 55 filings (11.18/100 renter HHs)2011: 56 filings (9.06/100 renter HHs)2012: 77 filings (12.46/100 renter HHs)2013: 82 filings (13.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 60 filings (9.71/100 renter HHs)2015: 82 filings (13.27/100 renter HHs)2016: 75 filings (6.30/100 renter HHs)2017: 84 filings (7.06/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 530Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.07×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-07-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2021-04-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-06-01: 7 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.68× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-10-01: 10 filings (2.31× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-02-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2022-03-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2022-04-01: 10 filings (1.30× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2022-06-01: 15 filings (1.88× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2022-10-01: 9 filings (2.08× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-12-01: 13 filings (2.78× baseline)2023-01-01: 25 filings (2.68× baseline)2023-02-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (0.78× baseline)2023-05-01: 9 filings (1.69× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-07-01: 8 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 9 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (2.08× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (1.31× baseline)2024-06-01: 12 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 15 filings (2.81× baseline)2024-08-01: 13 filings (1.77× baseline)2024-09-01: 16 filings (1.30× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2024-11-01: 9 filings (1.08× baseline)2024-12-01: 12 filings (2.57× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (0.96× baseline)2025-02-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2025-05-01: 15 filings (2.81× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (1.69× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-09-01: 10 filings (0.81× baseline)2025-10-01: 16 filings (3.70× baseline)2025-11-01: 12 filings (1.44× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dallas

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $36,724 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Against Dallas County at 47.9%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened. Average gross rent is $1,241, 16% below the Dallas average.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,413 filings here across 18 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 20.2% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 14.1% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113005700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113005700?

Census tract 48113005700 in Dallas scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113005700?

Median gross rent is $1,241/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113005700?

30.5% of residents in tract 48113005700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,299.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113005700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 98th, minority 99th, housing 92th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113005700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,413 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113005700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.06% of renter households, peaking at 20.2% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113005700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.07× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113005700 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113005700 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113005700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related