Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Dallas Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113006702 · Dallas, TX · pop 2,425

With a score of 5.1/10, tract 48113006702 in Dallas, TX reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,425 residents. around two-thirds of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Dallas County average of 47.9%.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 17% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units806
Renter share47.9%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate24.3%
Median income$46,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#31 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,049 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7426, -96.8772 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dallas scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
24.3% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,170 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Dallas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dallas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 006702Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 143Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.64×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (4.72× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (3.37× baseline)2020-03-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 10 filings (2.31× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (4.79× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-07-01: 17 filings (4.25× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (2.15× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dallas

Adults with no health insurance runs 44.5% against 11.3% nationally. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.2/10.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 44.3% against 31.5% nationally.

The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

It sits 1.3 points above the Dallas County average of 3.8. Average gross rent is $1,170, 21% below the Dallas average.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113006702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113006702?

Census tract 48113006702 in Dallas scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113006702?

Median gross rent is $1,170/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113006702?

24.3% of residents in tract 48113006702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,425.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113006702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 51th, minority 93th, housing 46th.
Q5

Did eviction filings in tract 48113006702 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.64× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q6

How does tract 48113006702 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113006702 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 48113006702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related