Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Lancaster Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113016803 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,873

For landlords sizing up Lancaster, census tract 48113016803 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.5/10. On the national scale it ranks #11,667 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 58% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,488 a month against an average household income of $53,025 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 54% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 23% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units2,270
Renter share54.4%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate19.3%
Median income$53,025

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 9 tracts In Lancaster
High
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#143 of 645 tracts In Dallas
High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,918 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#26,446 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lancaster and the region

Centroid at 32.5961, -96.7640 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lancaster scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lancaster
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
19.3% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$1,488 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lancaster
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lancaster
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lancaster
7.8

How Lancaster compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lancaster risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 016803Lancaster: 2.62.6Lancasterparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,465Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 9.62%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.8%Peak (2017)
  • 129Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130168032000: 49 filings (6.19/100 renter HHs)2001: 66 filings (8.34/100 renter HHs)2002: 64 filings (8.09/100 renter HHs)2003: 54 filings (6.83/100 renter HHs)2004: 63 filings (7.96/100 renter HHs)2005: 64 filings (7.91/100 renter HHs)2006: 91 filings (11.25/100 renter HHs)2007: 86 filings (10.63/100 renter HHs)2008: 103 filings (12.73/100 renter HHs)2009: 111 filings (13.72/100 renter HHs)2010: 66 filings (7.85/100 renter HHs)2011: 76 filings (8.93/100 renter HHs)2012: 67 filings (7.87/100 renter HHs)2013: 73 filings (8.58/100 renter HHs)2014: 85 filings (9.99/100 renter HHs)2015: 104 filings (12.22/100 renter HHs)2016: 114 filings (11.29/100 renter HHs)2017: 129 filings (12.77/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 163% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 874Total filings 2020-21
  • 11.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.12×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (0.66× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.35× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-09-01: 10 filings (0.70× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-11-01: 8 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (0.87× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 11 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (0.35× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-12-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-01-01: 19 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-02-01: 18 filings (1.69× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (0.58× baseline)2022-04-01: 11 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-06-01: 11 filings (1.06× baseline)2022-07-01: 13 filings (1.08× baseline)2022-08-01: 20 filings (2.07× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-10-01: 10 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-11-01: 14 filings (1.17× baseline)2022-12-01: 16 filings (1.45× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (0.66× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-04-01: 14 filings (1.91× baseline)2023-05-01: 13 filings (1.08× baseline)2023-06-01: 12 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-08-01: 13 filings (1.34× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-02-01: 11 filings (1.03× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (0.81× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 32 filings (3.31× baseline)2024-09-01: 42 filings (2.93× baseline)2024-10-01: 16 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 18 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 14 filings (1.27× baseline)2025-01-01: 15 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-02-01: 25 filings (2.34× baseline)2025-03-01: 22 filings (2.54× baseline)2025-04-01: 30 filings (4.09× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (0.58× baseline)2025-06-01: 37 filings (3.58× baseline)2025-07-01: 25 filings (2.08× baseline)2025-08-01: 20 filings (2.07× baseline)2025-09-01: 30 filings (2.09× baseline)2025-10-01: 23 filings (2.88× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-12-01: 32 filings (2.91× baseline)2026-01-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lancaster

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lancaster, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Dallas County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,465 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 9.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.8% of renter households in 2017.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113016803

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113016803?

Census tract 48113016803 in Lancaster scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113016803?

Median gross rent is $1,488/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113016803?

19.3% of residents in tract 48113016803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,873.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113016803?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 73th, minority 85th, housing 69th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113016803?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,465 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113016803 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.62% of renter households, peaking at 12.8% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113016803 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.12× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113016803 compare to Lancaster overall?

Tract 48113016803 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Lancaster at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lancaster; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lancaster

Top eight tracts in Lancaster ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related