Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Lancaster Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113016704 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,152

Census tract 48113016704 belongs to Lancaster, Texas. It is home to 4,152 residents and scores 6.5/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 76% of renter households, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,843 monthly, set against $69,079 in average yearly household income, roughly 32% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 5% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,619
Renter share20.6%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate15.8%
Median income$69,079

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 9 tracts In Lancaster
Elevated
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#240 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#2,781 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#35,899 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lancaster and the region

Centroid at 32.6172, -96.7759 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lancaster scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lancaster
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
15.8% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,843 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lancaster
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lancaster
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lancaster
7.8

How Lancaster compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lancaster risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 016704Lancaster: 2.62.6Lancasterparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 894Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 16.47%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.6%Peak (2013)
  • 72Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130167042000: 23 filings (11.62/100 renter HHs)2001: 26 filings (13.13/100 renter HHs)2002: 24 filings (12.12/100 renter HHs)2003: 38 filings (19.19/100 renter HHs)2004: 27 filings (13.64/100 renter HHs)2005: 35 filings (16.67/100 renter HHs)2006: 68 filings (32.38/100 renter HHs)2007: 47 filings (22.38/100 renter HHs)2008: 62 filings (29.52/100 renter HHs)2009: 55 filings (26.19/100 renter HHs)2010: 53 filings (13.32/100 renter HHs)2011: 65 filings (13.49/100 renter HHs)2012: 54 filings (11.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 75 filings (15.56/100 renter HHs)2014: 59 filings (12.24/100 renter HHs)2015: 49 filings (10.17/100 renter HHs)2016: 62 filings (10.97/100 renter HHs)2017: 72 filings (12.74/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 213% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 331Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.81×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-02-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (1.35× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (0.72× baseline)2022-09-01: 9 filings (1.42× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2023-06-01: 10 filings (2.31× baseline)2023-07-01: 12 filings (1.80× baseline)2023-08-01: 14 filings (1.68× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (1.31× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (1.05× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (0.72× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (0.96× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lancaster

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lancaster, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Dallas County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 53rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 894 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 16.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.6% of renter households in 2013.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113016704

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113016704?

Census tract 48113016704 in Lancaster scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113016704?

Median gross rent is $1,843/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113016704?

15.8% of residents in tract 48113016704 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,152.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113016704?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 85th, minority 87th, housing 3th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113016704?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 894 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113016704 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.47% of renter households, peaking at 15.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113016704 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.81× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113016704 compare to Lancaster overall?

Tract 48113016704 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Lancaster at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lancaster; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lancaster

Top eight tracts in Lancaster ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related