Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Huntington Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sugar Land
Tract 48157672004 ·
Fort Bend, TX · pop 6,001 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 48157672004 sits in the Huntington Village area of Sugar Land eviction risk, TX, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. It is home to 6,001 residents. 53% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 16%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,065
Renter share35.3%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$84,432
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Huntington Village
Moderate
Within parent city
93th percentile
#3 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
Very High
Within county
70th percentile
#41 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Elevated
Within state
63th percentile
#2,577 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region
Centroid at 29.6599, -95.6101 · click any tract to drill in
Why Huntington Village scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,541 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0
How Huntington Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
83%Socioeconomic
59%Household composition
90%Racial/ethnic minority
62%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Huntington Village
Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Against Fort Bend County at 42.8%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10.
At $1,541 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Sugar Land commands. That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 8.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Fort Bend County average of 3.8 closely.
Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $84,432. 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 48157672004
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157672004?
Census tract 48157672004 in the Huntington Village neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48157672004?
Median gross rent is $1,541/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48157672004?
10.0% of residents in tract 48157672004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,001.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48157672004?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 59th, minority 90th, housing 62th.
Q5
Is tract 48157672004 considered part of Huntington Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48157672004 fall within Huntington Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 48157672004 compare to Sugar Land overall?
Tract 48157672004 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Sugar Land at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land
Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.