Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally

Tiffany Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Layton

Tract 49011125905 · Davis, UT · pop 7,575 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

In the Tiffany Park area of Layton, census tract 49011125905 scores 4.1/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #73,216 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,124 a month while the average household earns $93,750 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 27% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 16% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units2,854
Renter share26.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$93,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Tiffany Park
Moderate
Within parent city
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 12 tracts In Layton
Elevated
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#20 of 66 tracts In Davis
Elevated
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#394 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Layton and the region

Centroid at 41.0720, -111.9233 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tiffany Park scores 2.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Layton
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,124 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Layton
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Layton
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Layton
4.9

How Tiffany Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tiffany Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.12.1This tracttract 125905Layton: 2.12.1Laytonparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 102Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.24%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2009)
  • 7Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111259052006: 10 filings (1.56/100 renter HHs)2009: 26 filings (4.06/100 renter HHs)2011: 13 filings (1.96/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (1.51/100 renter HHs)2015: 26 filings (3.92/100 renter HHs)2016: 10 filings (1.56/100 renter HHs)2018: 7 filings (1.09/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 30% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tiffany Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Layton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Davis County average of 4.0 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 102 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 2.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.1% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125905

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125905?

Census tract 49011125905 in the Tiffany Park neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011125905?

Median gross rent is $1,124/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125905?

7.0% of residents in tract 49011125905 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,575.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125905?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 63th, minority 50th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 49011125905 considered part of Tiffany Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011125905 fall within Tiffany Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125905?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 102 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125905 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.24% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49011125905 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49011125905 compare to Layton overall?

Tract 49011125905 scores 2.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Layton at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Layton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Layton

Top eight tracts in Layton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related