Crystal Lake Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chesapeake

The poverty rate is 25%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against the Chesapeake City average of 3.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points.

Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 3/10. SNAP participation runs 23.1% against 15.2% nationally.

At $1,432 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Chesapeake commands. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Statute speed, court posture and rent-regulation exposure are inherited from Chesapeake rather than measured on these blocks; the economic and supply components are the tract-level part of the score. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.2/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

about half of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $77,574.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.