Skip to content
Queets, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 55 residents

Queets, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Grays Harbor County · Population 55

In 2026
Risk score
6.9
ELEVATED

79th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.8 Now6.9
6.9 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.3 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 2.9 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.0 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.1 2000 · score 3.3 2001 · score 3.4 2002 · score 3.5 2003 · score 3.5 2004 · score 3.6 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 4.2 2009 · score 4.5 2010 · score 4.6 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 4.9 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 6.4 2021 · score 6.6 2022 · score 6.5 2023 · score 6.3 2024 · score 6.6 2025 · score 6.9 2026 · score 6.9

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.2 Regional 5.2 State 6.0 Economic 9.6 Supply 6.3 Rent Control 1.9 Eviction 5.5 Tenant 7.7 Housing 5.6 6.9 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +6.0% (2024)
    5.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    33.3% poverty · 26.7% unemp.
    9.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,141 average · 50.0% renters
    6.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    17.8% of income on rent
    1.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    144 days filing → judgment
    5.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    50.0% renters
    7.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Queets and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Queets compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Grays Harbor County
Elevated
#9 of 30 cities
Rank in county, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#9 of 30 cities in Grays Harbor County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Elevated
#190 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 70th percentileLowHigh
#190 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Queets risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Queets: 6.96.9QueetsThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.9
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 144d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,141/mo. A contested eviction takes 144 days and costs $8,809–$19,988 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 50.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 55 residents, 50.0% rent. 18% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 33.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.2 and 5.2 (GOP margin +6.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.5, housing court bias 5.6, rent-control risk 1.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9.6. Supply constraint: 6.3. The numbers behind those: 33.3% poverty, 26.7% unemployment, 18% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Queets sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Spokane, WA · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.7 Spokane Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Vancouver, WA · 160d · ~$15.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.2 Vancouver Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Spokane Valley, WA · 174d · ~$14.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Spokane Valley Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Queets
Queets · 144d · ~$14.4k all-in ($100/day) · score 6.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Queets, WA

Landlording in Queets, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.9/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Queets is a city of 55 residents where 50.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 17.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,141/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Queets eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Queets closes 144 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Queets's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Queets runs $8,809 to $19,988 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 144 days of typical timeline and $1,141/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.7/10 in Queets, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Queets: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $19,988 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Queets

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 144 days and roughly $19,988 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $7,995 to $11,992 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under HB 1236 + RCW 59.18.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Queets for no reason?

No. Washington state law, including in Queets, requires just cause for eviction. You cannot terminate a tenancy without a legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific owner-intent to occupy the property, and even then, strict notice periods apply.
Q2

How much notice do I need to give for non-payment of rent?

For non-payment of rent in Queets, you must provide a 14-day pay-or-quit notice. This gives the tenant 14 full days to either pay the rent owed or vacate the property before you can proceed with an eviction lawsuit.
Q3

What if my tenant pays rent late frequently?

Consistent late payment can be a lease violation. If your lease specifies a due date and late fees, and the tenant habitually pays late, you may be able to issue a "cure or quit" notice for lease violations, though this is distinct from non-payment and has its own rules under RCW § 59.18. Document every late payment.
Q4

Is rent control active in Queets, WA?

Currently, Washington state has no statewide rent control, and there are no local rent control ordinances in Queets. However, the political climate around Washington rent control rules is always something to watch.
Q5

Can I keep a tenant's security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No. You can only deduct from a security deposit for damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or other agreed-upon charges specified in the lease. You must provide an itemized statement within 21 days of the tenant vacating.
Q6

Should I offer "cash for keys" in Queets?

Yes, "cash for keys" can be a very effective strategy in Queets and throughout Washington. Given the high cost and long timeline of a formal eviction (144 days and up to $19,988), offering a tenant a few hundred or even a thousand dollars to move out voluntarily and leave the property in good condition can save you significant time, legal fees, and lost rent. Get the agreement in writing.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.9/10 places Queets in the 79th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.