Skip to content
High Bridge, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,196 residents

High Bridge, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Snohomish County · Population 3,196

In 2026
Risk score
6.9
ELEVATED

79th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average4.0 Now6.9
7.1 2.5 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.3 1993 · score 3.4 1994 · score 3.4 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 3.5 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.6 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.6 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.6 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.6 2008 · score 4.2 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.6 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.7 2017 · score 4.7 2018 · score 5.2 2019 · score 5.3 2020 · score 6.9 2021 · score 7.1 2022 · score 6.9 2023 · score 6.7 2024 · score 6.7 2025 · score 6.9 2026 · score 6.9

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.9 Regional 7.9 State 6.0 Economic 4.5 Supply 2.2 Rent Control 4.6 Eviction 5.6 Tenant 2.2 Housing 4.3 6.9 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.0% (2024)
    7.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.9
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    8.8% poverty · 2.2% unemp.
    4.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,433 average · 6.5% renters
    2.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    51.0% of income on rent
    4.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    173 days filing → judgment
    5.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    6.5% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across High Bridge and the region

Click any city to see its score

How High Bridge compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Snohomish County
High
#14 of 61 cities
Rank in county, 78th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 61 cities in Snohomish County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
High
#159 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 75th percentileLowHigh
#159 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
High Bridge risk score vs. county / state / U.S.High Bridge: 6.96.9High BridgeThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.9
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 173d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,433/mo. A contested eviction takes 173 days and costs $8,607–$18,391 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 6.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,196 residents, 6.5% rent. 51% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.9 and 7.9 (Dem margin +19.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.6, housing court bias 4.3, rent-control risk 4.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.5. Supply constraint: 2.2. The numbers behind those: 8.8% poverty, 2.2% unemployment, 51% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

High Bridge sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 7 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.7 Redmond Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York High Bridge
High Bridge · 173d · ~$13.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in High Bridge, WA

Landlording in High Bridge, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.9/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

High Bridge is a city of 3,196 residents where 6.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 51.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,433/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How High Bridge eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in High Bridge closes 173 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of High Bridge's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in High Bridge runs $8,607 to $18,391 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 173 days of typical timeline and $2,433/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in High Bridge, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in High Bridge: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $18,391 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in High Bridge

Trap · 4.6/10
The 4.5/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. High Bridge's rent-control-risk sub-score is 4.6/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in High Bridge without a reason?

No, Washington state requires "just cause" for all evictions, even for month-to-month tenancies. You cannot simply decide not to renew a lease without a legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific owner-occupancy clauses.

Q2

What's the fastest way to get a tenant out who isn't paying rent?

The fastest legal way is often "cash for keys." If the tenant agrees to move out voluntarily in exchange for a payment, it can bypass the lengthy court process. Otherwise, you must strictly follow the 14-day pay-or-quit notice process and then file an unlawful detainer action in court. There are no shortcuts.

Q3

How much can I charge for a late fee in High Bridge?

Washington law states that late fees must be "reasonable." While there isn't a specific dollar cap, generally, a late fee should not exceed a certain percentage of the monthly rent (often 5-10% is considered reasonable, but this is not set in stone by statute) and must be clearly stated in the lease agreement.

Q4

Can I keep the security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No. You can only deduct from a security deposit for damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or other breaches of the lease as specified by law. "Normal wear and tear" includes things like minor scuffs on walls, faded paint, or worn carpet. Document the condition of the unit thoroughly before move-in and after move-out.

Q5

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in High Bridge?

While not legally required, it is highly recommended. The eviction process in Washington, especially in King County, is complex and heavily favors tenants. A small error in notice, filing, or court procedure can lead to significant delays and costs. Given the 173-day average timeline and $8,607, $18,391 cost, a lawyer's expertise can save you time and money in the long run.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.9/10 places High Bridge in the 79th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.