Skip to content
Larch Way, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,424 residents

Larch Way, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Snohomish County · Population 4,424

In 2026
Risk score
6.7
ELEVATED

56th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.7 Now6.7
6.8 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 3.2 1993 · score 3.2 1994 · score 3.2 1995 · score 3.2 1996 · score 3.3 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.4 2001 · score 3.4 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.4 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.3 2011 · score 4.3 2012 · score 4.2 2013 · score 4.2 2014 · score 4.2 2015 · score 4.2 2016 · score 4.3 2017 · score 4.3 2018 · score 4.8 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 6.6 2021 · score 6.8 2022 · score 6.7 2023 · score 6.5 2024 · score 6.5 2025 · score 6.7 2026 · score 6.7

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 6.0 Economic 2.8 Supply 7.6 Rent Control 8.3 Eviction 6.0 Tenant 5.6 Housing 5.2 6.7 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.0% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    1.7% poverty · 1.6% unemp.
    2.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,002 average · 25.5% renters
    7.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    40.7% of income on rent
    8.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    163 days filing → judgment
    6.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    25.5% renters
    5.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Larch Way and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Larch Way compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Snohomish County
Moderate
#36 of 61 cities
Rank in county, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#36 of 61 cities in Snohomish County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Moderate
#326 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 49th percentileLowHigh
#326 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Larch Way risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Larch Way: 6.76.7Larch WayThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.7
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 163d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,002/mo. A contested eviction takes 163 days and costs $7,386–$17,130 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 25.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,424 residents, 25.5% rent. 41% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 1.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +19.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6, housing court bias 5.2, rent-control risk 8.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.8. Supply constraint: 7.6. The numbers behind those: 1.7% poverty, 1.6% unemployment, 41% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Larch Way sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 7 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.7 Redmond Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Larch Way
Larch Way · 163d · ~$12.3k all-in ($75/day) · score 6.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Larch Way, WA

Landlording in Larch Way, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.7/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Larch Way is a city of 4,424 residents where 25.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 40.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,002/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Larch Way eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Larch Way closes 163 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Larch Way's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Larch Way runs $7,386 to $17,130 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 163 days of typical timeline and $2,002/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.6/10 in Larch Way, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Larch Way: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,130 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Larch Way

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 163 days and roughly $17,130 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $6,852 to $10,278 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under HB 1236 + RCW 59.18.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can evict someone in Larch Way for not paying rent?

The absolute fastest is still around 30-60 days if everything goes perfectly and the tenant doesn't contest. That's 14 days for the notice, plus court filing, service, and hearing dates. However, the average is 163 days. Don't expect "fast."

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Larch Way if their lease is up and I just don't want to renew?

No, not without a "just cause." Washington state has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. You can't simply choose not to renew a lease without a legally recognized reason, even if the lease term has ended. This is a critical difference from many other states.

Q3

How much should I budget for an eviction attorney in Larch Way?

Expect to budget at least $2,000-$5,000 for a straightforward, uncontested eviction. If the tenant hires an attorney or the case becomes complex, it could easily exceed $10,000. It's a significant expense, but a necessary one given the legal complexities.

Q4

Is "cash for keys" legal in Washington?

Yes, "cash for keys" is legal and often a smart move in Washington. It's a voluntary agreement where you pay a tenant to move out by a specific date, leaving the property in good condition. It avoids the time and cost of a formal eviction. Always get the agreement in writing.

Q5

What's the biggest mistake landlords make in Larch Way?

The biggest mistake is not following the strict notice procedures and timelines outlined in RCW § 59.18. Any error, even minor, can lead to your case being dismissed, forcing you to start over and costing you more time and money. Don't cut corners; follow the law precisely. Also, not understanding the just-cause requirement is a common trap. For a broader view, check our Washington eviction risk overview.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.7/10 places Larch Way in the 56th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.