Skip to content
Summitview, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,321 residents

Summitview, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Yakima County · Population 2,321

In 2026
Risk score
6.6
ELEVATED

43th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.7 Now6.6
7.0 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.4 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 4.0 2009 · score 4.3 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.5 2012 · score 4.4 2013 · score 4.4 2014 · score 4.4 2015 · score 4.4 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 5.0 2019 · score 5.1 2020 · score 6.8 2021 · score 7.0 2022 · score 6.8 2023 · score 6.6 2024 · score 6.5 2025 · score 6.6 2026 · score 6.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.2 Regional 5.2 State 6.0 Economic 3.6 Supply 3.2 Rent Control 4.8 Eviction 5.9 Tenant 3.2 Housing 4.0 6.6 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +14.3% (2024)
    5.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    6.7% poverty · 1.2% unemp.
    3.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,814 average · 11.9% renters
    3.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    36.7% of income on rent
    4.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    173 days filing → judgment
    5.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    11.9% renters
    3.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Summitview and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Summitview compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Yakima County
Low
#19 of 27 cities
Rank in county, 31st percentileLowHigh
#19 of 27 cities in Yakima County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Low
#411 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 36th percentileLowHigh
#411 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Summitview risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Summitview: 6.66.6SummitviewThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.6
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 173d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,814/mo. A contested eviction takes 173 days and costs $7,102–$20,893 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 11.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,321 residents, 11.9% rent. 37% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.2 and 5.2 (GOP margin +14.3% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.9, housing court bias 4, rent-control risk 4.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.6. Supply constraint: 3.2. The numbers behind those: 6.7% poverty, 1.2% unemployment, 37% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Summitview sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Yakima, WA · 152d · ~$12.6k all-in ($83/day) · score 6.9 Yakima Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Spokane, WA · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.7 Spokane Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Vancouver, WA · 160d · ~$15.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.2 Vancouver Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Spokane Valley, WA · 174d · ~$14.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Spokane Valley Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Summitview
Summitview · 173d · ~$14.0k all-in ($81/day) · score 6.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Summitview, WA

Landlording in Summitview, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.6/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Summitview is a city of 2,321 residents where 11.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 36.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,814/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Summitview eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Summitview closes 173 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Summitview's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Summitview runs $7,102 to $20,893 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 173 days of typical timeline and $1,814/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.2/10 in Summitview, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Summitview: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $20,893 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Summitview

Trap · 4.8/10
The 4.1/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Summitview's rent-control-risk sub-score is 4.8/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Summitview for any reason if their lease is month-to-month?

No, Washington state has a statewide just-cause eviction law. You cannot evict a month-to-month tenant without a legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific owner-occupancy scenarios. A simple "no-cause" termination is generally not allowed.

Q2

How much notice do I have to give for a rent increase in Summitview?

For a month-to-month tenancy, you must provide at least 60 days' written notice before a rent increase can take effect. This applies statewide in Washington. Make sure the notice is in writing and properly delivered.

Q3

What if my tenant claims they can't pay rent because of a job loss or medical emergency?

While you can be empathetic, the legal process for non-payment of rent remains the same. You still need to issue the 14-day pay-or-quit notice. You can choose to work with the tenant on a payment plan, but get any agreement in writing. Be aware that accepting partial payment after issuing the notice can invalidate it, requiring you to start over. Consider directing them to local rental assistance programs.

Q4

Can I turn off utilities if my Summitview tenant isn't paying rent?

Absolutely not. It is illegal in Washington state to shut off utilities, change locks, or otherwise engage in "self-help" evictions. These actions can result in severe penalties, including fines and the tenant being able to sue you for damages. You must follow the formal legal eviction process through the courts.

Q5

What's the best way to screen for tenants who won't cause eviction problems?

Focus on a comprehensive screening process. Verify income (aim for 3x rent), check credit history (look for consistent payment, not just high scores), and most call previous landlords (not just the current one). Ask specific questions about payment history, property care, and adherence to lease terms. A clear criminal background check is also advisable. Don't skip these steps to save a few dollars.

Q6

Are there rent control rules I need to worry about in Summitview?

Currently, there are no local rent control ordinances in Summitview. However, Washington state law dictates certain parameters for rent increases, and the state's Washington rent control rules are a topic of ongoing discussion. Always stay informed about state legislative changes, as they can impact all landlords.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.6/10 places Summitview in the 43rd percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.