Skip to content
Sierra Vista Southeast, Arizona eviction risk overview
City brief · 14,330 residents

Sierra Vista Southeast, AZ Eviction Risk: LOW

Cochise County · Population 14,330

In 2026
Risk score
2.7
LOW

64th percentile, Arizona.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average2.1 Now2.7
3.2 1.5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.6 1982 · score 1.8 1983 · score 1.7 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 2.0 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 2.0 2001 · score 2.0 2002 · score 2.1 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.0 2005 · score 1.9 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.1 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.4 2011 · score 2.4 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 3.0 2021 · score 3.2 2022 · score 2.7 2023 · score 2.7 2024 · score 2.8 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.7

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.6 Regional 4.6 State 2.2 Economic 6.2 Supply 5.1 Rent Control 6.6 Eviction 1.9 Tenant 3.9 Housing 5.9 2.7 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +23.2% (2024)
    4.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.6
  3. State political climate
    Arizona legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    10.0% poverty · 5.8% unemp.
    6.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,180 average · 14.2% renters
    5.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    32.8% of income on rent
    6.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    40 days filing → judgment
    1.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    14.2% renters
    3.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sierra Vista Southeast and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Sierra Vista Southeast compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cochise County
Moderate
#12 of 22 cities
Rank in county, 48th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 22 cities in Cochise County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arizona
Elevated
#198 of 464 cities
Rank in state, 58th percentileLowHigh
#198 of 464 cities in Arizona for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sierra Vista Southeast risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Sierra Vista South: 2.72.7Sierra Vista SouthThis cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.7
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 40d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,180/mo. A contested eviction takes 40 days and costs $2,038–$4,264 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 14.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 14,330 residents, 14.2% rent. 33% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.6 and 4.6 (GOP margin +23.2% (2024)). State climate at 2.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.9, housing court bias 5.9, rent-control risk 6.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.2. Supply constraint: 5.1. The numbers behind those: 10.0% poverty, 5.8% unemployment, 33% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sierra Vista Southeast sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Tucson, AZ · 43d · ~$3.3k all-in ($78/day) · score 3.2 Tucson Mesa, AZ · 38d · ~$3.1k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.8 Mesa Gilbert, AZ · 37d · ~$3.6k all-in ($97/day) · score 2.4 Gilbert Chandler, AZ · 40d · ~$3.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.5 Chandler Glendale, AZ · 42d · ~$3.0k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.9 Glendale Scottsdale, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($88/day) · score 2.3 Scottsdale Peoria, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.4 Peoria Tempe, AZ · 37d · ~$3.0k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.1 Tempe Surprise, AZ · 41d · ~$2.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.4 Surprise Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Sierra Vista Southeast
Sierra Vista Southeast · 40d · ~$3.2k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sierra Vista Southeast, AZ

Landlording in Sierra Vista Southeast, Arizona, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.7/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sierra Vista Southeast is a city of 14,330 residents where 14.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 32.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,180/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sierra Vista Southeast eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sierra Vista Southeast closes 40 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sierra Vista Southeast's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sierra Vista Southeast runs $2,038 to $4,264 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 40 days of typical timeline and $1,180/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.9/10 in Sierra Vista Southeast, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arizona, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sierra Vista Southeast: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arizona's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,264 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sierra Vista Southeast

Trap · 10%
Local poverty rate is 10%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward higher volume in Cochise County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 6.6/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the rental concentration corridors.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give the 5-day notice?

If your tenant pays *some* but not all of the rent after receiving a 5-day notice, you generally should not accept it unless you're willing to restart the eviction process. Accepting partial payment can be seen as waiving your right to proceed with the eviction based on that notice. If you accept a partial payment, you'd likely need to issue a new 5-day notice for the remaining balance. Consult your attorney.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for having an unauthorized pet in Sierra Vista Southeast?

Yes, if your lease prohibits pets or specifies certain types of pets and the tenant violates that clause, it's typically a material breach of the lease. You would issue a 10-day notice to cure or quit. If they don't remove the pet or remedy the violation within 10 days, you can proceed with an eviction filing.
Q3

How long does it take for the sheriff to perform a lockout after a Writ of Restitution is issued?

Once the Writ of Restitution is issued, it usually takes the sheriff's office a few days to a week to schedule and perform the lockout. This depends on their workload and staffing. You must coordinate directly with the Cochise County Sheriff's office to get a specific date and time.
Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Sierra Vista Southeast?

While you can represent yourself in a Special Detainer Action in Arizona, it's highly recommended to hire an attorney, especially for your first eviction or if the tenant contests it. The legal process has strict rules and deadlines, and even small errors can cause significant delays and added costs. Given the typical eviction cost range of $2,038, $4,264, the legal fees are a worthwhile investment to ensure proper procedure. You can read more on the Arizona eviction risk overview for more state-level context.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.7/10 places Sierra Vista Southeast in the 64th percentile of Arizona cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.