Tanuri Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. At $1,853 a month, rents run 31% over what the rest of Catalina Foothills commands.

On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

Food insecurity runs 4.9% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Pima County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 filings here across 7 tracked years.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 7% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2/10. Against average income of $154,500, annual rent is just 14%.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.