San Tan Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , San Tan Valley

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10. 15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.4/10. Against the Pinal County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Average gross rent is $2,128, close to the San Tan Valley average.

Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $91,929.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.