3 census tracts · pop 11,995 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 6.8/10
· range 6.6–7.1
Rose Glen takes in 3 census tracts of Concord, CA, population 11,995. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.8/10, in the Elevated tier. The main counterweight is economic stress, at 1.3/10.
On the high side is rent-regulation exposure at 8.3/10. 20% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. Cost burden runs 42% against 36.2% citywide, putting Rose Glen 6.1% over its own city.
Sitting well above the midpoint is tenant-organizing strength at 7.9/10. Among the 13 mapped neighborhoods of Concord, it ranks #11 by risk, the lower third.
At 28% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out. For a like-for-like read, Clayton Valley Highlands and Walnut Country score within a fraction of it. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Its 3 tracts score within 0.5 points of one another, so the area figure travels well to individual addresses. Average gross rent runs $2,331, close to the Concord average.
Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $122,732.
The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
6.8
Elevated
3 tracts · population-weighted
Rose Glen vs ConcordHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority61%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport49%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Rose Glen
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
10.4%Housing insecurity
5.4%Utility shutoff threat
11.2%Food insecurity
9.4%SNAP enrollment
6.5%No health insurance
26.1%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Rose Glen
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Rose Glen?
Rose Glen scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier) across 3 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Rose Glen compare to Concord overall?
Rose Glen scores 0.6 points lower than Concord overall (7.4/10). Renters spend 42% of income on rent vs 36% citywide. Average rent: $2,331 vs $2,274.
Q3
What is the average rent in Rose Glen?
Average gross rent in Rose Glen is $2,331/month (pop-weighted across 3 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Rose Glen residents are renters?
28% of Rose Glen households are renter-occupied (vs 38% in Concord). The neighborhood has 11,995 residents.
Q5
Is Rose Glen a high social-vulnerability area?
Rose Glen sits in the 37th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in Rose Glen have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in Rose Glen is census tract 06013333102 (score 7.1/10). Across the 3 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 6.6 to 7.1, a spread of 0.5 points.
Q7
How safe is Rose Glen for landlords?
Rose Glen carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (6.8/10). Pop-weighted across 3 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Concord as a whole (7.4/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of Rose Glen?
Rose Glen has 12,025 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (54.2%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (16.7%), Hispanic / Latino (16.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.