Skip to content
San Anselmo, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 12,679 residents

San Anselmo, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Marin County · Population 12,679

In 2026
Risk score
8.2
HIGH

84th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average4.6 Now8.2
9.5 2.5 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 3.1 1992 · score 3.8 1993 · score 3.8 1994 · score 3.9 1995 · score 3.7 1996 · score 3.7 1997 · score 3.8 1998 · score 3.8 1999 · score 3.8 2000 · score 3.8 2001 · score 3.8 2002 · score 3.9 2003 · score 3.9 2004 · score 4.0 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.1 2007 · score 4.2 2008 · score 5.0 2009 · score 5.2 2010 · score 5.3 2011 · score 5.5 2012 · score 5.4 2013 · score 5.4 2014 · score 5.3 2015 · score 5.3 2016 · score 5.9 2017 · score 6.0 2018 · score 6.2 2019 · score 7.0 2020 · score 9.5 2021 · score 9.1 2022 · score 8.6 2023 · score 8.5 2024 · score 8.8 2025 · score 8.3 2026 · score 8.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.5 Regional 8.5 State 6.8 Economic 5.1 Supply 8.4 Rent Control 7.9 Eviction 6.2 Tenant 6.9 Housing 5.6 8.2 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +63.9% (2024)
    8.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.5
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    5.3% poverty · 5.4% unemp.
    5.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,797 average · 31.6% renters
    8.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    36.7% of income on rent
    7.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    289 days filing → judgment
    6.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    31.6% renters
    6.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Anselmo and the region

Click any city to see its score

How San Anselmo compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Marin County
High
#8 of 30 cities
Rank in county, 76th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 30 cities in Marin County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
High
#357 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 78th percentileLowHigh
#357 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
San Anselmo risk score vs. county / state / U.S.San Anselmo: 8.28.2San AnselmoThis cityCounty: 8.28.2Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 8.2
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 8.2/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 289d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,797/mo. A contested eviction takes 289 days and costs $16,661–$37,385 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 31.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 12,679 residents, 31.6% rent. 37% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8.5 and 8.5 (Dem margin +63.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.2, housing court bias 5.6, rent-control risk 7.9. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.1. Supply constraint: 8.4. The numbers behind those: 5.3% poverty, 5.4% unemployment, 37% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

San Anselmo sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Fremont, CA · 254d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 8 Fremont Santa Rosa, CA · 248d · ~$24.2k all-in ($98/day) · score 8 Santa Rosa Hayward, CA · 287d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.3 Hayward Vallejo, CA · 279d · ~$24.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 8.2 Vallejo Concord, CA · 252d · ~$23.8k all-in ($94/day) · score 8 Concord Fairfield, CA · 246d · ~$24.7k all-in ($100/day) · score 8 Fairfield Berkeley, CA · 267d · ~$27.9k all-in ($104/day) · score 8.2 Berkeley Antioch, CA · 284d · ~$23.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 8.4 Antioch Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle San Anselmo
San Anselmo · 289d · ~$27.0k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in San Anselmo, CA

Landlording in San Anselmo, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 8.2/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

San Anselmo is a city of 12,679 residents where 31.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 36.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,797/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How San Anselmo eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in San Anselmo closes 289 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of San Anselmo's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in San Anselmo runs $16,661 to $37,385 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 289 days of typical timeline and $2,797/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.9/10 in San Anselmo, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in San Anselmo: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $37,385 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in San Anselmo

Trap · 31.6%
31.6% renter share against 12,679 residents produces roughly 4,007 rental occupants in San Anselmo. Marin County voted D 66.5% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the best way to avoid an eviction in San Anselmo?

The best way is through rigorous tenant screening. Verify income, check credit, and call previous landlords. A good tenant from the start saves you immense headaches later. Also, respond promptly to maintenance requests and communicate clearly to maintain a good relationship.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in San Anselmo?

No. California has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. You need a specific, legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or owner move-in. You cannot simply decide not to renew a lease without a just cause after a tenant has resided there for 12 months.
Q3

How much notice do I need to give to raise the rent?

For month-to-month tenancies, you need to give 30 days' notice for a rent increase of 10% or less. For increases greater than 10%, you need to give 60 days' notice. Remember, statewide rent control may also limit how much you can raise the rent annually.
Q4

What if my tenant claims their income source is protected?

California has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because their income comes from a lawful source, such as a housing voucher (e.g., Section 8). You must evaluate them based on the same financial and background criteria as other applicants, ensuring they meet your income requirements.
Q5

Should I use a property manager in San Anselmo?

For landlords with 1-5 units and a day job, a good property manager can be worth the cost, especially in California. They understand the complex laws, handle tenant communication, and manage maintenance, reducing your risk and stress significantly. Look for one specializing in Marin County.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 8.2/10 places San Anselmo in the 84th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.