McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento
Tract 06067000300 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,528 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Tract 06067000300 sits in the McKinley Village area of Sacramento eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.5/10. It is home to 3,528 residents. Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 36% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5774, -121.4547 · click any tract to drill in
Why McKinley Village scores 6.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow McKinley Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 24%Grade B
- 58%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.5%Food insecurity
- 6.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 4.2%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.3/10. At $2,377 a month, rents run 34% over what the rest of Sacramento commands.
Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.
Food insecurity runs 6.5% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 7.0% against 14.2% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 82nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06067000300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000300?
What is the average rent in tract 06067000300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000300?
Is tract 06067000300 considered part of McKinley Village?
What share of households in tract 06067000300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067000300 compare to Sacramento overall?
Was tract 06067000300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.