2 census tracts · pop 11,748 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 6.8/10
· range 6.3–7.6
Glenview takes in 2 census tracts of Winter Gardens, CA, population 11,748. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.8/10, in the Elevated tier. Cost burden runs 53% against 32.4% citywide, putting Glenview 20.8% over its own city.
26% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is supply constraint, at 1.4/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint is rent-regulation exposure at 8.1/10. At $1,461 a month, rents sit 24% under what the rest of Winter Gardens commands. Internally this is not one market. Tract scores span 6.3 to 7.6, so two buildings inside the same boundary can carry materially different risk.
On the high side is tenant-organizing strength at 7.9/10. At 22% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.
Rent takes 17% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market.
For a specific building, read the per-tract breakdown below rather than the 6.8 headline, because the internal range is too wide to average safely. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
6.8
Elevated
2 tracts · population-weighted
Glenview vs Winter GardensHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority51%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport82%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Glenview
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
13.7%Housing insecurity
6.8%Utility shutoff threat
15.3%Food insecurity
15.2%SNAP enrollment
8.3%No health insurance
29.7%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Glenview
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Glenview?
Glenview scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Glenview compare to Winter Gardens overall?
Glenview scores 0.1 points lower than Winter Gardens overall (6.9/10). Renters spend 53% of income on rent vs 32% citywide. Average rent: $1,461 vs $1,913.
Q3
What is the average rent in Glenview?
Average gross rent in Glenview is $1,461/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Glenview residents are renters?
22% of Glenview households are renter-occupied (vs 37% in Winter Gardens). The neighborhood has 11,748 residents.
Q5
Is Glenview a high social-vulnerability area?
Glenview sits in the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in Glenview have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in Glenview is census tract 06073016806 (score 7.6/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 6.3 to 7.6, a spread of 1.3 points.
Q7
How safe is Glenview for landlords?
Glenview carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (6.8/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Winter Gardens as a whole (6.9/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of Glenview?
Glenview has 12,393 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (65.6%), Hispanic / Latino (26.2%), Other / Multiracial (4.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.