Skip to content
Longmont, Colorado eviction risk overview
Ranked #228 of 1,861 nationally

Longmont, CO Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Boulder County · Population 99,406

In 2026
Risk score
6.6
ELEVATED

96th percentile, Colorado.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average3.3 Now6.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.4 1977 · score 1.5 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.2 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.7 1999 · score 2.7 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.8 2003 · score 2.8 2004 · score 2.8 2005 · score 2.9 2006 · score 2.9 2007 · score 3.0 2008 · score 3.7 2009 · score 3.8 2010 · score 3.9 2011 · score 4.1 2012 · score 3.9 2013 · score 4.0 2014 · score 4.1 2015 · score 4.2 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.7 2018 · score 4.9 2019 · score 5.2 2020 · score 6.2 2021 · score 6.2 2022 · score 6.2 2023 · score 6.2 2024 · score 6.3 2025 · score 6.6 2026 · score 6.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.7 Regional 6.7 State 4.7 Economic 5.4 Supply 8.3 Rent Control 7.8 Eviction 4.5 Tenant 7.8 Housing 6.2 6.6 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +55.8% (2024)
    6.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.7
  3. State political climate
    Colorado legislature & governorship
    4.7
  4. Economic stress
    8.6% poverty · 4.3% unemp.
    5.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,816 average · 37.5% renters
    8.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.7% of income on rent
    7.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    104 days filing → judgment
    4.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    37.5% renters
    7.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Longmont and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Longmont compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Boulder County
Very High
#2 of 26 cities
Rank in county — 96th percentileBottomTop
#2 of 26 cities in Boulder County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Colorado
Very High
#19 of 479 cities
Rank in state — 96th percentileBottomTop
#19 of 479 cities in Colorado for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Longmont risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Longmont: 6.66.6LongmontThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.6
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 104d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,816/mo. A contested eviction takes 104 days and costs $4,802–$12,685 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 37.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 99,406 residents, 37.5% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.7 and 6.7 (Dem margin +55.8% (2024)). State climate at 4.7 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.5, housing court bias 6.2, rent-control risk 7.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.4. Supply constraint: 8.3. The numbers behind those: 8.6% poverty, 4.3% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Longmont sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Denver, CO · 98d · ~$8.6k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Denver Aurora, CO · 94d · ~$9.3k all-in ($99/day) · score 5.9 Aurora Fort Collins, CO · 106d · ~$9.0k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.0 Fort Collins Lakewood, CO · 91d · ~$8.7k all-in ($96/day) · score 5.9 Lakewood Thornton, CO · 98d · ~$7.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 6.4 Thornton Arvada, CO · 109d · ~$8.2k all-in ($75/day) · score 6.2 Arvada Westminster, CO · 99d · ~$7.3k all-in ($74/day) · score 6.4 Westminster Greeley, CO · 105d · ~$8.0k all-in ($76/day) · score 4.7 Greeley Centennial, CO · 93d · ~$8.6k all-in ($93/day) · score 5.9 Centennial Boulder, CO · 100d · ~$8.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.6 Boulder Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Longmont
Longmont · 104d · ~$8.7k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Longmont, CO

Landlording in Longmont, Colorado, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.6/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Longmont is a city of 99,406 residents where 37.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,816/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Longmont eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.5/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Longmont closes 104 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Longmont's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Longmont runs $4,802 to $12,685 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 104 days of typical timeline and $1,816/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.8/10 in Longmont, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Colorado, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Longmont: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Colorado's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $12,685 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Longmont

Trap · 7.8/10
The 6.6/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Longmont's rent-control-risk sub-score is 7.8/10, driven by demographic and political pressure for tenant relief.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays rent late often, but always within the 10-day notice period?

If they consistently pay within the 10-day notice, you generally can't evict them for non-payment. However, you can charge late fees as outlined in your lease. If the late payments become a nuisance or violate a specific lease clause about timely payment (not just the 10-day grace period), you might have grounds for a different type of lease violation notice, but it's trickier. It’s better to have clear late fee terms in your lease and enforce them.

Q2

Can I increase the rent in Longmont?

Yes, Colorado does not have statewide rent control, and Longmont does not have its own rent control ordinance. However, given the high rent control risk score (7.8/10), this could change in the future. Always provide proper written notice for rent increases as specified in your lease or by state law (typically 30 days for month-to-month tenancies). Keep increases reasonable to retain good tenants and avoid high turnover, which is costly.

Q3

Do I have to accept Section 8 or other housing vouchers?

Yes, Colorado has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a Section 8 voucher or other legal forms of income assistance to pay rent. You must treat these applicants the same as any other, applying your standard screening criteria fairly. Refusing to accept a voucher can lead to discrimination claims.

Q4

What's the biggest mistake landlords make in Longmont evictions?

The biggest mistake is usually improper notice or self-help evictions. Landlords often rush the notice, miss a step, or try to change locks or shut off utilities. This is illegal in Colorado and will get your case dismissed, potentially leading to you owing the tenant money. Follow the process exactly, even if it feels slow. The second biggest mistake is not getting legal help early enough.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.6/10 places Longmont in the 96th percentile of Colorado cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.