Skip to content
Neighborhood · Superior, CO

Cross Creek Eviction Risk: Lower

2 census tracts · pop 8,181 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.3/10 · range 3.2–3.3

Cross Creek takes in 2 census tracts of Superior, CO and houses 8,181 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3.3/10, placing it in the Lower tier. 37% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, well above the Superior rate of 23.7%.

The voucher gap is 32.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. The main counterweight is economic stress, at 1.1/10.

On the high side is tenant-organizing strength at 7.9/10. Running hot is supply constraint at 7.5/10. The severe-burden share is 8%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

At $2,733 a month, rents sit 11% over what the rest of Superior commands. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. The 2 tracts here are tightly clustered, 0.1 points apart at the extremes.

Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $158,965. 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
2 tracts · population-weighted
Cross Creek vs Superior How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
37.0% +56%
Superior: 23.7%
Average gross rent
$2,733 +11%
Superior: $2,457
Average HH income
$158,965 +1%
Superior: $157,909
Poverty rate
3.1% +5%
Superior: 3.0%
Renter share
45.4% +16%
Superior: 39.1%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Cross Creek and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 3.2–3.3

Why Cross Creek scores 3.3

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 4.7–4.7 across tracts
4.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 7.8–7.8 across tracts
7.8
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.7–6.7 across tracts
6.7
Rent control risk
37% of income on rent · Range 3.1–3.1 across tracts
3.1
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.1–4.1 across tracts
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
45% renter households · Range 7.9–7.9 across tracts
7.9
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 2.7–2.7 across tracts
2.7
Economic stress
3.1% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.1 across tracts
1.1
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 5.9–10.0 across tracts
7.5
Risk score comparison

Cross Creek vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Cross Creek score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.3Cross CreekNeighborhood4.6Parent cityhost city5.0Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

2 tracts in Cross Creek

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
08013060601 3.3 5,021 33% $2,250
08013061300 3.2 3,160 44% $3,501
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 8

Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 10%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 26%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 43%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 10%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Frequently asked

About Cross Creek

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Cross Creek?

Cross Creek scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Cross Creek compare to Superior overall?

Cross Creek scores 1.3 points lower than Superior overall (4.6/10). Renters spend 37% of income on rent vs 24% citywide. Average rent: $2,733 vs $2,457.
Q3

What is the average rent in Cross Creek?

Average gross rent in Cross Creek is $2,733/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Cross Creek residents are renters?

45% of Cross Creek households are renter-occupied (vs 39% in Superior). The neighborhood has 8,181 residents.
Q5

Is Cross Creek a high social-vulnerability area?

Cross Creek sits in the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Cross Creek have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Cross Creek is census tract 08013060601 (score 3.3/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 3.2 to 3.3, a spread of 0.1 points.
Q7

How safe is Cross Creek for landlords?

Cross Creek carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.3/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Superior as a whole (4.6/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Cross Creek?

Cross Creek has 8,479 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (72.6%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (14%), Hispanic / Latino (8.9%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Cross Creek

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Superior

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Cross Creek.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further