Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Palomino Park Resort Eviction Risk: Moderate , Highlands Ranch
Tract 08035014113 · Douglas County, CO · pop 3,121 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 4.1/10, tract 08035014113 in the Palomino Park Resort area of Highlands Ranch, CO reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. The voucher gap is 36.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,091
Renter share9.3%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate0.0%
Median income$152,981
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
27
th percentile
Low
Within county
27
th percentile
Low
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Highlands Ranch and the region
Centroid at 39.5474, -104.9076 · click any tract to drill in
Why Palomino Park Resort scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Highlands Ranch
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
0.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,930 rent vs county FMR
8.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Highlands Ranch
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Highlands Ranch
4.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Highlands Ranch
4.1
How Palomino Park Resort compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 16%Socioeconomic
- 7%Household composition
- 40%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 11Total filings over 2 yrs
- 4.95%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2010)
- 5Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Palomino Park Resort. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Palomino Park Resort
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.7/10.
Against Douglas County at 47.3%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.3/10. Average gross rent is $2,930, 16% above the Highlands Ranch average.
The filing record is not thin: 11 evictions over 2 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2010, when 7.4% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 5.0% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.6/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 08035014113
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08035014113?
Census tract 08035014113 in the Palomino Park Resort neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 08035014113?
Median gross rent is $2,930/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 08035014113?
0.0% of residents in tract 08035014113 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,121.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 08035014113?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 7th, minority 40th, housing 10th.
Q5
Is tract 08035014113 considered part of Palomino Park Resort?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08035014113 fall within Palomino Park Resort (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08035014113?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 11 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 08035014113 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.95% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 08035014113 compare to Highlands Ranch overall?
Tract 08035014113 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Highlands Ranch at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Highlands Ranch eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Highlands Ranch
Top eight tracts in Highlands Ranch ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CO
08035014131
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
08035014110
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
Palomino Park Resort
4.9
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
08035014126
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
08035014140
4.6
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
08035014128
4.5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
08035014145
4.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CO
08035014107
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Related
Explore the geography around tract 08035014113
Parent city ↑
Highlands Ranch
4.4 / 10
Parent county ↑
Douglas County
Parent state ↑
Colorado
Sibling tract →
Palomino Park Resort
4.1 / 10
Sibling tract →
Palomino Park Resort
4.2 / 10
Sibling tract →
Palomino Park Resort
4.6 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts