1 census tracts · pop 3,184 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.5/10
· range 4.5–4.5
Rose Harbor is a one-tract neighborhood of Citrus Park, FL and houses 3,184 people. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.5/10, in the Moderate tier. Severe burden reaches 44%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.
Cost burden runs 68% against 36.1% citywide, putting Rose Harbor 31.4% over its own city. The main counterweight is eviction-process difficulty, at 1.4/10. Running hot is rent-regulation exposure at 7.7/10.
At $1,575 a month, rents sit 17% under what the rest of Citrus Park commands. Court records for this tract carry 327 eviction filings. On the high side is tenant-organizing strength at 7.3/10.
Filing activity peaked in 2010 at 4.4% of renter households. Recent filings have not receded much: 3.7% in 2016 against a 4.4% peak.
That places it #2 of 5 neighborhoods in Citrus Park. Social vulnerability runs high at 8/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.
Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $66,875. 50% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 4.5/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Risk score
4.5
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Rose Harbor vs Citrus ParkHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority77%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport90%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab
Court-record eviction history in Rose Harbor
Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
327Total filings (sum)
5.46%Avg annual filing rate
4.4%Peak year (2010)
3.70%Latest filed (2016)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
68Total filings 2020-21
0.9Avg monthly observed
1.6Pre-pandemic baseline
0.57×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline. Tracked under Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA).
Frequently asked
About Rose Harbor
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Rose Harbor?
Rose Harbor scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Rose Harbor compare to Citrus Park overall?
Rose Harbor scores 0.5 points higher than Citrus Park overall (4/10). Renters spend 68% of income on rent vs 36% citywide. Average rent: $1,575 vs $1,891.
Q3
What is the average rent in Rose Harbor?
Average gross rent in Rose Harbor is $1,575/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Rose Harbor residents are renters?
50% of Rose Harbor households are renter-occupied (vs 34% in Citrus Park). The neighborhood has 3,184 residents.
Q5
Is Rose Harbor a high social-vulnerability area?
Rose Harbor sits in the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is Rose Harbor for landlords?
Rose Harbor carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (4.5/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Citrus Park as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of Rose Harbor?
Rose Harbor has 3,101 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (42.5%), Hispanic / Latino (37.4%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (8.7%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
