Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Lake Mango Shores Eviction Risk: Lower , Palm Springs

Tract 12099004101 · Palm Beach, FL · pop 4,485 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 12099004101 covers the Lake Mango Shores area of Palm Springs in Florida. Home to 4,485 residents, it scores 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #32,192 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 58% of renter households, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,654 monthly, set against $72,596 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 27% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 11% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,652
Renter share26.8%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$72,596

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Lake Mango Shores
Moderate
Within parent city
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 10 tracts In Palm Springs
Very Low
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#127 of 372 tracts In Palm Beach
Elevated
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#2,345 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Palm Springs and the region

Centroid at 26.6549, -80.0962 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lake Mango Shores scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palm Springs
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,654 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palm Springs
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palm Springs
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.1

How Lake Mango Shores compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lake Mango Shores risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.53.5This tracttract 004101Palm Springs: 2.52.5Palm Springsparent cityCounty: 3.03.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 308Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.2%Peak (2009)
  • 18Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120990041012000: 31 filings (6.13/100 renter HHs)2001: 26 filings (5.14/100 renter HHs)2002: 25 filings (4.94/100 renter HHs)2003: 28 filings (5.54/100 renter HHs)2009: 37 filings (8.19/100 renter HHs)2010: 35 filings (5.48/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (3.51/100 renter HHs)2012: 25 filings (3.13/100 renter HHs)2013: 35 filings (4.39/100 renter HHs)2014: 20 filings (2.51/100 renter HHs)2015: 18 filings (2.26/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 42% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 102Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.71×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (1.38× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (1.84× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (1.84× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (1.41× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (2.19× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.38× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.84× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (1.41× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Other Oregon Counties as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lake Mango Shores. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lake Mango Shores

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Palm Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Palm Beach County average of 5.0 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.71x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12099004101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12099004101?

Census tract 12099004101 in the Lake Mango Shores neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12099004101?

Median gross rent is $1,654/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12099004101?

9.6% of residents in tract 12099004101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,485.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12099004101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 81th, minority 82th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 12099004101 considered part of Lake Mango Shores?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12099004101 fall within Lake Mango Shores (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12099004101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 308 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12099004101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.66% of renter households, peaking at 8.2% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12099004101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.71× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Other Oregon eviction laws Counties), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12099004101 compare to Palm Springs overall?

Tract 12099004101 scores 3.5/10, higher than the parent city of Palm Springs at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palm Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palm Springs

Top eight tracts in Palm Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related