Skip to content
Neighborhood · Manchester, NH

Straw/Smyth Eviction Risk: Lower

3 census tracts · pop 9,240 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 2.7/10 · range 2.3–3.7

Straw/Smyth is a white (non-hispanic) neighborhood in Manchester with 3 census tracts and a population of 9,240 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 2.7/10 (Lower tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 34% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 16% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $1,393/month sits 11% lower than the Manchester citywide average ($1,564).

Risk score
2.7
Lower
3 tracts · population-weighted
Straw/Smyth vs Manchester How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
33.6% +12%
Manchester: 30.0%
Average gross rent
$1,393 -11%
Manchester: $1,564
Average HH income
$95,742 +24%
Manchester: $77,415
Poverty rate
3.9% -64%
Manchester: 10.7%
Renter share
44.0% -14%
Manchester: 51.3%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Straw/Smyth and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 3 tracts span score 2.3–3.7

Why Straw/Smyth scores 2.7

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.4–5.4 across tracts
5.4
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Rent control risk
34% of income on rent · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
44% renter households · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Economic stress
3.9% below poverty line · Range 1.0–2.2 across tracts
1.3
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.2–5.0 across tracts
3.9
Risk score comparison

Straw/Smyth vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Straw/Smyth score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Straw/Smyth: 2.72.7Straw/SmythNeighborhoodParent city: 3.73.7Parent cityhost cityState: 3.93.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Straw/Smyth?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 1.4 points from 2.3 to 3.7. Moderate variation across constituent tracts.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

3 tracts in Straw/Smyth

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
33011000600 3.7 2,304 43% $1,288
33011000901 2.5 3,759 32% $1,308
33011000700 2.3 3,177 29% $1,571
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 34

Pop-weighted across 3 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 26%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 25%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 29%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 60%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Straw/Smyth

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Straw/Smyth

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Straw/Smyth?

Straw/Smyth scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier) across 3 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Straw/Smyth compare to Manchester overall?

Straw/Smyth scores 1.0 points lower than Manchester overall (3.7/10). Renters spend 34% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $1,393 vs $1,564.
Q3

What is the average rent in Straw/Smyth?

Average gross rent in Straw/Smyth is $1,393/month (pop-weighted across 3 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Straw/Smyth residents are renters?

44% of Straw/Smyth households are renter-occupied (vs 51% in Manchester). The neighborhood has 9,240 residents.
Q5

Is Straw/Smyth a high social-vulnerability area?

Straw/Smyth sits in the 34th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Straw/Smyth have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Straw/Smyth is census tract 33011000600 (score 3.7/10). Across the 3 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 2.3 to 3.7, a spread of 1.4 points.
Q7

How safe is Straw/Smyth for landlords?

Straw/Smyth carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (2.7/10). Pop-weighted across 3 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Manchester as a whole (3.7/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Straw/Smyth?

Straw/Smyth has 9,343 residents (White (non-Hispanic) Neighborhood). Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (82.2%), Hispanic / Latino (7.8%), Other / Multiracial (6.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Straw/Smyth

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Manchester

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Straw/Smyth.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further