Elizabeth Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34039032102 · Union County, NJ · pop 3,303
34039032102 is a census tract in Elizabeth, NJ. It scores 6.3/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,303 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Elizabeth and the region
Centroid at 40.6709, -74.2434 · click any tract to drill in
Why Elizabeth scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Elizabeth compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 37
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 54%Socioeconomic
- 70%Household composition
- 61%Racial/ethnic minority
- 6%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 42%Grade A
- 56%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.5%Housing insecurity
- 5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.4%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 14.4%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Elizabeth
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Union Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
It tracks the Union County average of 6.6 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 34039032102
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039032102?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039032102?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039032102?
What share of households in tract 34039032102 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34039032102 compare to Elizabeth overall?
Was tract 34039032102 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Elizabeth
Top eight tracts in Elizabeth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.