Skip to content
Moscow, Ohio eviction risk overview
City brief · 147 residents

Moscow, OH Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Clermont County · Population 147

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

30th percentile, Ohio.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average2.3 Now2.2
3.7 1.6 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.7 1992 · score 2.2 1993 · score 2.2 1994 · score 2.1 1995 · score 2.1 1996 · score 2.3 1997 · score 2.3 1998 · score 2.3 1999 · score 2.4 2000 · score 2.3 2001 · score 2.3 2002 · score 2.3 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.5 2009 · score 2.7 2010 · score 2.8 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.6 2014 · score 2.5 2015 · score 2.5 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.5 2021 · score 3.7 2022 · score 2.7 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.2 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.9 Regional 3.9 State 2.4 Economic 5.2 Supply 5.2 Rent Control 1.3 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 5.2 Housing 2.2 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +35.8% (2024)
    3.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.9
  3. State political climate
    Ohio legislature & governorship
    2.4
  4. Economic stress
    35.2% poverty · 4.2% unemp.
    5.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,284 average · 18.4% renters
    5.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    44.3% of income on rent
    1.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    44 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    18.4% renters
    5.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Moscow and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Moscow compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Clermont County
Low
#15 of 23 cities
Rank in county, 36th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 23 cities in Clermont County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Ohio
Low
#967 of 1,251 cities
Rank in state, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#967 of 1,251 cities in Ohio for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Moscow risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Moscow: 2.22.2MoscowThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.82.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 44d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,284/mo. A contested eviction takes 44 days and costs $1,512–$3,434 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 18.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 147 residents, 18.4% rent. 44% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 35.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.9 and 3.9 (GOP margin +35.8% (2024)). State climate at 2.4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 2.2, rent-control risk 1.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.2. Supply constraint: 5.2. The numbers behind those: 35.2% poverty, 4.2% unemployment, 44% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Moscow sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.4 Cincinnati Hamilton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 Hamilton Middletown, OH · 37d · ~$3.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.8 Middletown Columbus, OH · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.1 Columbus Cleveland, OH · 39d · ~$3.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.7 Cleveland Toledo, OH · 45d · ~$3.0k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.3 Toledo Akron, OH · 43d · ~$2.8k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.4 Akron Dayton, OH · 38d · ~$2.6k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.4 Dayton Parma, OH · 42d · ~$2.9k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.8 Parma Canton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 Canton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Moscow
Moscow · 44d · ~$2.5k all-in ($56/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Moscow, OH

Landlording in Moscow, Ohio, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Moscow is a city of 147 residents where 18.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 44.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,284/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Moscow eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Moscow closes 44 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Moscow's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Moscow runs $1,512 to $3,434 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 44 days of typical timeline and $1,284/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.2/10 in Moscow, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Ohio, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Moscow: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Ohio's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,434 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Moscow

Trap · 36.6 POINTS
Clermont County voted Republican by 36.6 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral statutory bias under ORC 1923 + 5321.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Moscow without a reason?

No, you cannot. In Ohio, you need a legal reason (just cause) to evict a tenant, such as non-payment of rent, a lease violation, or the end of a fixed-term lease. Ohio does not have statewide just-cause eviction requirements that would restrict your ability to end a tenancy at the end of a lease term, but you can't just evict someone without cause during a lease term.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to pay rent after it's due in Moscow?

This depends on your lease agreement. Ohio law allows landlords to charge late fees if rent isn't paid on time, but it doesn't mandate a grace period. Your lease should clearly state when rent is due and when late fees apply. For eviction purposes due to non-payment, you must serve a 3-day pay-or-quit notice after the rent is actually past due.

Q3

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction order?

If a judge issues a Writ of Restitution and the tenant still won't leave, you must contact the Clermont County Sheriff's office. They will schedule a time to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. You cannot do this yourself. Attempting to force a tenant out or change locks without the sheriff present is illegal.

Q4

Can I keep the security deposit for normal wear and tear in Moscow?

No. You can only deduct from a security deposit for damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or utility bills. Normal wear and tear includes things like faded paint, minor scuffs, or worn carpet. Large holes in walls, broken windows, or excessive dirt are generally considered damages. Always provide an itemized list of deductions within 30 days.

Q5

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Moscow?

While you can represent yourself in Ohio eviction court, especially for straightforward non-payment cases, it's often advisable to hire an attorney. They understand the specific procedures, notice requirements, and court rules, reducing the risk of costly errors that could delay the eviction or even get your case dismissed. If the tenant hires a lawyer or raises complex defenses, having your own counsel is critical.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places Moscow in the 30th percentile of Ohio cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.