Skip to content
Happy Valley, Oregon eviction risk overview
Ranked #337 of 1,861 nationally

Happy Valley, OR Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Clackamas County · Population 26,738

In 2026
Risk score
6.4
ELEVATED

92th percentile, Oregon.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average3.8 Now6.4
10 5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.1 1993 · score 3.1 1994 · score 3.1 1995 · score 3.1 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.2 1998 · score 3.3 1999 · score 3.3 2000 · score 2.9 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.1 2003 · score 3.2 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.5 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.6 2014 · score 4.8 2015 · score 4.9 2016 · score 5.0 2017 · score 5.2 2018 · score 5.5 2019 · score 5.9 2020 · score 6.7 2021 · score 6.7 2022 · score 6.7 2023 · score 6.8 2024 · score 6.8 2025 · score 6.4 2026 · score 6.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.3 Regional 8.3 State 7.2 Economic 4.7 Supply 6.8 Rent Control 8.5 Eviction 6.5 Tenant 4.3 Housing 6.2 6.4 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +9.7% (2024)
    8.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.3
  3. State political climate
    Oregon legislature & governorship
    7.2
  4. Economic stress
    6.9% poverty · 3.7% unemp.
    4.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,029 average · 21.1% renters
    6.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    35.4% of income on rent
    8.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    128 days filing → judgment
    6.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    21.1% renters
    4.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Happy Valley and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Happy Valley compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Clackamas County
Elevated
#8 of 22 cities
Rank in county — 67th percentileBottomTop
#8 of 22 cities in Clackamas County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oregon
Very High
#40 of 425 cities
Rank in state — 91th percentileBottomTop
#40 of 425 cities in Oregon for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Happy Valley risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Happy Valley: 6.46.4Happy ValleyThis cityCounty: 6.36.3Countyavg in countyState: 6.66.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.4
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 128d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,029/mo. A contested eviction takes 128 days and costs $6,898–$17,671 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 21.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 26,738 residents, 21.1% rent. 35% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8.3 and 8.3 (Dem margin +9.7% (2024)). State climate at 7.2 — tenant-leaning legislature.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 7.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 7.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.5, housing court bias 6.2, rent-control risk 8.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.7. Supply constraint: 6.8. The numbers behind those: 6.9% poverty, 3.7% unemployment, 35% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Happy Valley sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Portland, OR · 149d · ~$11.8k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Portland Salem, OR · 144d · ~$11.8k all-in ($82/day) · score 7.1 Salem Gresham, OR · 135d · ~$12.6k all-in ($94/day) · score 7.4 Gresham Hillsboro, OR · 133d · ~$11.2k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.1 Hillsboro Beaverton, OR · 144d · ~$12.8k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.3 Beaverton Tigard, OR · 145d · ~$12.8k all-in ($88/day) · score 6.1 Tigard Aloha, OR · 151d · ~$13.4k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.0 Aloha Eugene, OR · 127d · ~$13.3k all-in ($104/day) · score 7.7 Eugene Bend, OR · 129d · ~$13.2k all-in ($102/day) · score 6.6 Bend Medford, OR · 129d · ~$12.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.4 Medford Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Happy Valley
Happy Valley · 128d · ~$12.3k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Happy Valley, OR

Landlording in Happy Valley, Oregon, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.4/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Happy Valley is a city of 26,738 residents where 21.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 35.4% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,029/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Happy Valley eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.5/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Happy Valley closes 128 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Happy Valley's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Happy Valley runs $6,898 to $17,671 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 128 days of typical timeline and $2,029/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.3/10 in Happy Valley, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oregon, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Happy Valley: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oregon's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,671 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Happy Valley

Trap · 61.3 POINTS
Politically, Multnomah County voted Democratic by 61.3 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 35.4% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of ORS 90 + SB 608.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Happy Valley?

No. Oregon has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. After the first year of tenancy, you generally need a specific, legally recognized reason to evict, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific landlord-side reasons like needing to move into the unit yourself (under strict conditions). A "no-cause" eviction is typically only allowed within the first year, with a 90-day notice.

Q2

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Happy Valley?

You have 31 days from the date the tenant moves out and returns possession of the unit to either return the full security deposit or provide an itemized statement of deductions. Failing to do so can result in owing the tenant double the amount wrongfully withheld.

Q3

Is Happy Valley rent-controlled?

Oregon has statewide rent control, which applies to Happy Valley. Landlords can generally increase rent by no more than 7% plus the consumer price index (CPI) in any 12-month period. There are specific rules and exceptions, so always check the current year's cap.

Q4

Can I deny a tenant application because they use a Section 8 voucher?

No. Oregon has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot discriminate against an applicant solely because they receive rental assistance, such as a Section 8 voucher. You must apply your screening criteria consistently to all applicants.

Q5

What's the first step if my Happy Valley tenant stops paying rent?

The very first legal step is to serve a 10-day pay-or-quit notice. This notice informs the tenant they have 10 days to pay the overdue rent or move out. If they don't comply after 10 days, you can then proceed with filing an eviction lawsuit in court.

Q6

What if my tenant damages the property?

Document all damages with photos and notes immediately. If the damage is beyond normal wear and tear, you can deduct the cost of repairs from the security deposit, provided you follow the 31-day return/itemized statement rule. For significant damage exceeding the deposit, you may need to pursue a separate claim in small claims court or as part of the eviction action, though collecting can be difficult.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.4/10 places Happy Valley in the 92th percentile of Oregon cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.