Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,906 of 84,120 nationally

Cabbage Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Lancaster

Tract 42071001000 · Lancaster County, PA · pop 4,098 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 6.6/10, tract 42071001000 in the Cabbage Hill area of Lancaster, PA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,098. Severe burden reaches 54%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 15% Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units1,340
Renter share56.3%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate29.8%
Median income$51,897

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cabbage Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 21 tracts In Lancaster
Very High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 116 tracts In Lancaster County
Very High
Within state
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#436 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lancaster and the region

Centroid at 40.0344, -76.3152 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cabbage Hill scores 6.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lancaster
4.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
29.8% poverty · this tract
7.4
Supply constraint
$1,256 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lancaster
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lancaster
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lancaster
6.9

How Cabbage Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cabbage Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.6This tracttract 0010005.2Lancasterparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 908Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 20.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.1%Peak (2005)
  • 137Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42071001000
Filings climbed 19% over the past 7 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cabbage Hill

Cost burden runs about three-quarters here against 41.1% across Lancaster County. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.

It sits 2.4 points above the Lancaster County average of 4.2. The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.6/10. On the high side, economic stress reads 7.4/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 908 filings here across 7 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2005 at 20.1% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lancaster. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 20.0% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #14,906 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.4/10. Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 2.0 points hotter. Average gross rent is $1,256, close to the Lancaster average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 42071001000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42071001000?

Census tract 42071001000 in the Cabbage Hill neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42071001000?

Median gross rent is $1,256/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 74% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42071001000?

29.8% of residents in tract 42071001000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,098.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42071001000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 70th, minority 81th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 42071001000 considered part of Cabbage Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42071001000 fall within Cabbage Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42071001000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 908 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42071001000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.04% of renter households, peaking at 20.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42071001000 compare to Lancaster overall?

Tract 42071001000 scores 6.6/10, higher than the parent city of Lancaster at 5.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lancaster eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42071001000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lancaster

Top eight tracts in Lancaster ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related