Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Contempo Eviction Risk: Moderate , Union City

Tract 06001440304 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,662 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

In the Contempo neighborhood of Union City, census tract 06001440304 scores 5.4/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,230 a month while the average household earns $142,675 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 10% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,359
Renter share22.4%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$142,675

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 11 tracts In Contempo
Moderate
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 16 tracts In Union City
Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#226 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6,499 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Union City and the region

Centroid at 37.5869, -122.0766 · click any tract to drill in

Why Contempo scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Union City
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,230 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Union City
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Union City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Union City
5.6

How Contempo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Contempo risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 440304Union City: 8.18.1Union Cityparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Contempo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Contempo

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Union City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Alameda County average of 5.8 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001440304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001440304?

Census tract 06001440304 in the Contempo neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001440304?

Median gross rent is $2,230/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001440304?

5.2% of residents in tract 06001440304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,662.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001440304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 56th, minority 91th, housing 55th.
Q5

Is tract 06001440304 considered part of Contempo?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001440304 fall within Contempo (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001440304 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001440304 compare to Union City overall?

Tract 06001440304 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Union City at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Union City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Union City

Top eight tracts in Union City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related