Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally

Contempo Eviction Risk: Moderate , Union City

Tract 06001440333 · Alameda, CA · pop 2,732 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

In the Contempo area of Union City, census tract 06001440333 scores 5.4/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,131 a month against an average household income of $127,708 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 10% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units869
Renter share16.8%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate9.2%
Median income$127,708

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 11 tracts In Contempo
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 16 tracts In Union City
Elevated
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#202 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#5,876 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Union City and the region

Centroid at 37.6053, -122.0738 · click any tract to drill in

Why Contempo scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Union City
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.2% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$3,131 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Union City
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Union City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Union City
5.6

How Contempo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Contempo risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 440333Union City: 8.18.1Union Cityparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Contempo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Contempo

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Union City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Alameda County average of 5.8 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001440333

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001440333?

Census tract 06001440333 in the Contempo neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001440333?

Median gross rent is $3,131/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001440333?

9.2% of residents in tract 06001440333 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,732.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001440333?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 28th, minority 93th, housing 59th.
Q5

Is tract 06001440333 considered part of Contempo?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001440333 fall within Contempo (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001440333 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001440333 compare to Union City overall?

Tract 06001440333 scores 4.8/10, lower than the parent city of Union City at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Union City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Union City

Top eight tracts in Union City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related