Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06067008130 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,010 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Foothill Farms

In Foothill Farms in Sacramento County, census tract 06067008130 scores 5.8/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #25,614 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

29% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,165 monthly, set against $86,645 in average yearly household income, roughly 30% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 14% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,365
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$86,645

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 9 tracts In Foothill Farms
Very Low
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#187 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Moderate
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#4,313 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#15,522 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region

Centroid at 38.6951, -121.3320 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foothill Farms scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,165 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9

How Foothill Farms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foothill Farms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 008130Foothill Farms: 8.38.3Foothill Farmsparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foothill Farms, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 61st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067008130

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008130?

Census tract 06067008130 in Foothill Farms scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067008130?

Median gross rent is $2,165/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008130?

7.0% of residents in tract 06067008130 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,010.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008130?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 92th, minority 58th, housing 35th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06067008130 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06067008130 compare to Foothill Farms overall?

Tract 06067008130 scores 5.7/10, lower than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms

Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related