Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #1,455 of 84,120 nationally
Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06067007423 · Sacramento, CA · pop 6,770
Tract 06067007423 covers Foothill Farms in Sacramento County in California. Home to 6,770 residents, it scores $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 69% of renter households, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,382 a month against an average household income of $44,225 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. Renters make up 76% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
8.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 53%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units2,197
Renter share75.9%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate29.8%
Median income$44,225
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
97
th percentile
Very High
Within state
93
th percentile
Very High
National
98
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6718, -121.3628 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 8.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
29.8% poverty · this tract
7.4
Supply constraint
$1,382 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9
How Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 92
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 93%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 78%Racial/ethnic minority
- 66%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 30.1%Housing insecurity
- 20.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 38.8%Food insecurity
- 46.4%SNAP enrollment
- 21.5%Transit barriers
- 15.1%No health insurance
- 25.5%Frequent mental distress
- 43.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foothill Farms, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 30.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 20.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067007423
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007423?
Census tract 06067007423 in Foothill Farms scores 8.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067007423?
Median gross rent is $1,382/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007423?
29.8% of residents in tract 06067007423 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,770.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007423?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 93th, minority 78th, housing 66th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067007423 struggle to pay rent?
About 30.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067007423 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Tract 06067007423 scores 8.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Foothill Farms at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
06067007429
7.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007501
7.5
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007428
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007416
6.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007415
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007422
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007414
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067008130
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related