Census Tract · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally
Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067007414 ·
Sacramento, CA · pop 4,615 · 73% of tract blocks fall in Foothill Farms
Census tract 06067007414 covers part of Foothill Farms, CA, and scores 7.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,615 residents. 64% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Sacramento County average of 50.2%.
Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%Stable renters 18%Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,448
Renter share50.6%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$76,929
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
13th percentile
#8 of 9 tracts In Foothill Farms
Very Low
Within county
49th percentile
#184 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Moderate
Within state
44th percentile
#5,095 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
85th percentile
#12,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6882, -121.3583 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 7.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,795 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9
How Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
18.7%Housing insecurity
10.1%Utility-shutoff threat
21.1%Food insecurity
21.5%SNAP enrollment
11.9%Transit barriers
11.2%No health insurance
21.2%Frequent mental distress
34.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 7.9/10.
Nationally it ranks #12,481 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 7.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,795, close to the Foothill Farms average.
Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $76,929. 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067007414
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007414?
Census tract 06067007414 in Foothill Farms scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067007414?
Median gross rent is $1,795/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007414?
10.5% of residents in tract 06067007414 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,615.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007414?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 86th, minority 77th, housing 73th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067007414 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067007414 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Tract 06067007414 scores 7.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.