Within parent city
38
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #10,727 of 84,120 nationally
Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067007422 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,827
Census tract 06067007422 covers part of Foothill Farms, CA, and scores 7.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,827 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.
Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units880
Renter share60.7%
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate12.6%
Median income$75,435
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
50
th percentile
Moderate
National
87
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6918, -121.3409 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 7.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.6% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,717 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9
How Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 67
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 76%Household composition
- 62%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.5%Housing insecurity
- 10.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.4%Food insecurity
- 22.3%SNAP enrollment
- 12.0%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 21.6%Frequent mental distress
- 33.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 7.9/10.
SNAP participation runs 22.3% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for about half of renters. It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,717, close to the Foothill Farms average.
Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $75,435. 61% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067007422
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007422?
Census tract 06067007422 in Foothill Farms scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067007422?
Median gross rent is $1,717/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007422?
12.6% of residents in tract 06067007422 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,827.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007422?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 76th, minority 62th, housing 30th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067007422 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067007422 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Tract 06067007422 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
06067007423
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007429
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007501
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007428
7.9
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007416
7.7
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007415
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007414
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067008130
6.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Related