Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally
Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067007416 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,124
With a score of 7.7/10, tract 06067007416 in Foothill Farms, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,124 residents. Cost burden runs roughly one in four here against 50.2% across Sacramento County.
Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,468
Renter share34.7%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate14.8%
Median income$74,167
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
61
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
56
th percentile
Elevated
National
89
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6811, -121.3539 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 7.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.8% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,509 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9
How Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 83
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 64%Racial/ethnic minority
- 50%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.4%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 20.1%Food insecurity
- 21.3%SNAP enrollment
- 11.5%Transit barriers
- 10.4%No health insurance
- 20.4%Frequent mental distress
- 35.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.8/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $1,509, 11% below the Foothill Farms average.
It sits 0.6 points above the Sacramento County average of 7.1. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $74,167.
35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067007416
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007416?
Census tract 06067007416 in Foothill Farms scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067007416?
Median gross rent is $1,509/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007416?
14.8% of residents in tract 06067007416 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,124.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007416?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 97th, minority 64th, housing 50th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067007416 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067007416 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Tract 06067007416 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
06067007429
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007501
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007423
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007428
7.9
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007422
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007415
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007414
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067008130
6.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Related