Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067007416 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,124
Census tract 06067007416 runs through Foothill Farms in Sacramento County. With 4,124 residents, it scores 5.8/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 70% of US census tracts.
About 27% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,509 monthly, set against $74,167 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6811, -121.3539 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 6.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 83
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 64%Racial/ethnic minority
- 50%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.4%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 20.1%Food insecurity
- 21.3%SNAP enrollment
- 11.5%Transit barriers
- 10.4%No health insurance
- 20.4%Frequent mental distress
- 35.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foothill Farms, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 17.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06067007416
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007416?
What is the average rent in tract 06067007416?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007416?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007416?
What share of households in tract 06067007416 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067007416 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.