Census Tract · Ranked #8,653 of 84,120 nationally

Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06067007428 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,475

06067007428 is a census tract in Foothill Farms, CA. It scores 7.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,475. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score

7.9

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 9% Owners 73%

Tract context

Occupied units1,197

Renter share27.2%

SVI overall0.41

Poverty rate18.4%

Median income$79,970

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region

Centroid at 38.6995, -121.3466 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foothill Farms scores 7.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Foothill Farms

6.6

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

18.4% poverty · this tract

4.6

Supply constraint

$2,154 rent vs county FMR

4.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Foothill Farms

8.5

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.7

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Foothill Farms

9.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Foothill Farms

7.9

How Foothill Farms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

39%Socioeconomic
49%Household composition
48%Racial/ethnic minority
39%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

14.9%Housing insecurity
8.6%Utility-shutoff threat
16.7%Food insecurity
17.9%SNAP enrollment
9.9%Transit barriers
7.9%No health insurance
20.1%Frequent mental distress
32.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms

67% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Sacramento County average of 50.2%. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $79,970 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Average gross rent is $2,154, 27% above the Foothill Farms average.

Running hot, housing-court posture reads 7.9/10. The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points.

Nationally it ranks #8,653 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.7/10.

27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067007428

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007428?

Census tract 06067007428 in Foothill Farms scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06067007428?

Median gross rent is $2,154/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007428?

18.4% of residents in tract 06067007428 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,475.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007428?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 49th, minority 48th, housing 39th.

What share of households in tract 06067007428 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06067007428 compare to Foothill Farms overall?

Tract 06067007428 scores 7.9/10, higher than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms

Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.