Within parent city
38
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally
Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067007415 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,177
In Foothill Farms in Sacramento County, census tract 06067007415 scores 6.4/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,578 a month against an average household income of $77,969 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,141
Renter share28.5%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$77,969
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
60
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
65
th percentile
Elevated
National
89
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6790, -121.3468 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,578 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9
How Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 46
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 60%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 23%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.2%Housing insecurity
- 8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.2%Food insecurity
- 17.9%SNAP enrollment
- 10.1%Transit barriers
- 9.0%No health insurance
- 19.5%Frequent mental distress
- 34.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foothill Farms, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 15.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 46th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067007415
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007415?
Census tract 06067007415 in Foothill Farms scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067007415?
Median gross rent is $1,578/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007415?
12.8% of residents in tract 06067007415 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,177.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007415?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 50th, minority 53th, housing 23th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067007415 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067007415 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Tract 06067007415 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
06067007423
8.3
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007429
7.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007501
7.5
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007428
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007416
6.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007422
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007414
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067008130
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related