Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #2,892 of 84,120 nationally

Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06067007429 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,769

Foothill Farms anchors census tract 06067007429, which lands at 6.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #6,514 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,630 monthly, set against $58,012 in average yearly household income, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 70% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 25% Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units1,909
Renter share70.5%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate23.8%
Median income$58,012

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 9 tracts In Foothill Farms
High
Within county
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,333 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
National
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#2,892 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region

Centroid at 38.6982, -121.3577 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foothill Farms scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.8% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,630 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9

How Foothill Farms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foothill Farms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.67.6This tracttract 007429Foothill Farms: 8.38.3Foothill Farmsparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foothill Farms, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067007429

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007429?

Census tract 06067007429 in Foothill Farms scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067007429?

Median gross rent is $1,630/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007429?

23.8% of residents in tract 06067007429 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,769.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007429?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 83th, minority 73th, housing 93th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06067007429 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06067007429 compare to Foothill Farms overall?

Tract 06067007429 scores 7.6/10, lower than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms

Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related