Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067007429 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,769
Foothill Farms anchors census tract 06067007429, which lands at 6.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #6,514 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,630 monthly, set against $58,012 in average yearly household income, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 70% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6982, -121.3577 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 7.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 85%Socioeconomic
- 83%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 93%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 19.9%Housing insecurity
- 11.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.7%Food insecurity
- 26.1%SNAP enrollment
- 13.5%Transit barriers
- 10.3%No health insurance
- 21.7%Frequent mental distress
- 34.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foothill Farms, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 19.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06067007429
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007429?
What is the average rent in tract 06067007429?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007429?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007429?
What share of households in tract 06067007429 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067007429 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.