Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: High

Tract 06067007429 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,769

06067007429 is a census tract in Foothill Farms, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 25% Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units1,909
Renter share70.5%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate23.8%
Median income$58,012

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Foothill Farms
Very High
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#90 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
High
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#5,730 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region

Centroid at 38.6982, -121.3577 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foothill Farms scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.8% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,630 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9

How Foothill Farms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foothill Farms risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.4This tracttract 0074297.0Foothill Farmsparent city7.1Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms

Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. Annualized rent equals 34% of average household income of $58,012, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. 70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

On the high side, housing-court posture reads 7.9/10. Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.

SNAP participation runs 26.1% against 15.2% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.3/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $1,630, close to the Foothill Farms average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067007429

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007429?

Census tract 06067007429 in Foothill Farms scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067007429?

Median gross rent is $1,630/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007429?

23.8% of residents in tract 06067007429 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,769.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007429?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 83th, minority 73th, housing 93th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06067007429 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06067007429 compare to Foothill Farms overall?

Tract 06067007429 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms

Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related