Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Glenwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Candler-McAfee

Tract 13089023101 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,033 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

How risky is Glenwood Hills in Candler-McAfee for landlords? Census tract 13089023101 scores 6.8/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,380 a month while the average household earns $69,297 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 13% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,639
Renter share37.5%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate13.0%
Median income$69,297

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Glenwood Hills
Elevated
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Candler-McAfee
Low
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#76 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#1,284 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Candler-McAfee and the region

Centroid at 33.7440, -84.2761 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glenwood Hills scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
13.0% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,380 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.1

How Glenwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glenwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 023101Candler-McAfee: 3.03.0Candler-McAfeeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,973Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 36.91%Avg annual filing rate
  • 42.5%Peak (2007)
  • 243Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890231012004: 213 filings (28.51/100 renter HHs)2007: 275 filings (42.50/100 renter HHs)2011: 214 filings (32.57/100 renter HHs)2012: 251 filings (38.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 258 filings (39.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 263 filings (40.03/100 renter HHs)2015: 256 filings (38.96/100 renter HHs)2016: 243 filings (35.22/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 789Total filings 2020-21
  • 10.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glenwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glenwood Hills

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,973 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 36.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 42.5% of renter households in 2007.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023101?

Census tract 13089023101 in the Glenwood Hills neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023101?

Median gross rent is $1,380/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023101?

13.0% of residents in tract 13089023101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,033.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 6th, minority 78th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023101 considered part of Glenwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023101 fall within Glenwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,973 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 36.91% of renter households, peaking at 42.5% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023101 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023101 compare to Candler-McAfee overall?

Tract 13089023101 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Candler-McAfee at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 13089023101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Candler-McAfee

Top eight tracts in Candler-McAfee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related