Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Glenwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Candler-McAfee

Tract 13089023501 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,582 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 13089023501 belongs to Glenwood Hills in Candler-McAfee, Georgia. It is home to 3,582 residents and scores 6.4/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 42% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,480 a month against an average household income of $69,904 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 27% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,335
Renter share46.7%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate14.4%
Median income$69,904

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Glenwood Hills
High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Candler-McAfee
Elevated
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#1,222 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Candler-McAfee and the region

Centroid at 33.7351, -84.2691 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glenwood Hills scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.4% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,480 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
6.9

How Glenwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glenwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 023501Candler-McAfee: 3.03.0Candler-McAfeeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,551Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 47.49%Avg annual filing rate
  • 66.2%Peak (2012)
  • 250Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890235012004: 243 filings (60.45/100 renter HHs)2007: 279 filings (37.40/100 renter HHs)2011: 432 filings (61.19/100 renter HHs)2012: 467 filings (66.15/100 renter HHs)2013: 312 filings (44.19/100 renter HHs)2014: 284 filings (40.23/100 renter HHs)2015: 284 filings (40.23/100 renter HHs)2016: 250 filings (30.05/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,743Total filings 2020-21
  • 22.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 76 filings (760.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 66 filings (660.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glenwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glenwood Hills

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023501?

Census tract 13089023501 in the Glenwood Hills neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023501?

Median gross rent is $1,480/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023501?

14.4% of residents in tract 13089023501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,582.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 45th, minority 93th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023501 considered part of Glenwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023501 fall within Glenwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023501?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,551 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 47.49% of renter households, peaking at 66.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023501 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023501 compare to Candler-McAfee overall?

Tract 13089023501 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Candler-McAfee at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Candler-McAfee

Top eight tracts in Candler-McAfee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related