Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally

Glenwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Candler-McAfee

Tract 13089023601 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,770 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 13089023601 runs through Glenwood Hills in Candler-McAfee. With 2,770 residents, it scores 5.8/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #26,228 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $92,717 a year. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 16% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,080
Renter share21.3%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$92,717

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Glenwood Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Candler-McAfee
Very Low
Within county
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#120 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#1,650 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Candler-McAfee and the region

Centroid at 33.7357, -84.2987 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glenwood Hills scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
6.9

How Glenwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glenwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 023601Candler-McAfee: 3.03.0Candler-McAfeeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 558Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 19.65%Avg annual filing rate
  • 24.2%Peak (2012)
  • 67Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890236012004: 58 filings (19.25/100 renter HHs)2007: 81 filings (20.44/100 renter HHs)2011: 73 filings (20.56/100 renter HHs)2012: 86 filings (24.23/100 renter HHs)2013: 70 filings (19.72/100 renter HHs)2014: 72 filings (20.28/100 renter HHs)2015: 51 filings (14.37/100 renter HHs)2016: 67 filings (18.36/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 16% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 144Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glenwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glenwood Hills

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 558 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 19.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 24.2% of renter households in 2012.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 73rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023601?

Census tract 13089023601 in the Glenwood Hills neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023601?

11.3% of residents in tract 13089023601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,770.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 72th, minority 79th, housing 56th.
Q4

Is tract 13089023601 considered part of Glenwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023601 fall within Glenwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 558 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 19.65% of renter households, peaking at 24.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089023601 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089023601 compare to Candler-McAfee overall?

Tract 13089023601 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Candler-McAfee at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Candler-McAfee

Top eight tracts in Candler-McAfee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related